Search found 7197 matches

[ Search found 7197 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5720 »
Author Message

 Forum: FD Scale Drawings  Topic: Cold War Attack Aircraft Challenge

 Post subject: Re: Cold War Attack Aircraft Challenge Posted: April 2nd, 2020, 10:41 pm 

Replies: 47
Views: 13031


In the early 1960's, the USN issued the VAL requirement for the replacement of the A-4 Skyhawk. This requirement asked for an single seat aircraft, based on an existing airframe, which could deliver a load of 12 Mk 82 bombs 600 nautical miles away. The payload/range favored the use of the new TF30 e...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: USS Montana (BB-67) ca. 1988 Missile Augmentation ReBoot

 Post subject: Re: USS Montana (BB-67) ca. 1988 Missile Augmentation ReBoot Posted: March 29th, 2020, 9:42 pm 

Replies: 2
Views: 446


The first Mk 41 VLS was operational in 1986, so this ship would have been fitted as one of the first with the Mk 41 VLS. Seems unlikely, as the Iowa's at that time received the Armoured box launchers. The Iowa's also had most of the gun tubs for their anti-aircraft guns removed, to allow for space f...

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: Future challenge ideas/suggestions

 Post subject: Re: Future challenge ideas/suggestions Posted: March 28th, 2020, 8:59 pm 

Replies: 52
Views: 34252


I had an idea just now Common hull challenge: - 2 ship drawings, any era, any nation. - both ship drawings must be different (in role, age, nation, weapons, whatever) - Both ship drawings must have the hull in common. judging criteria: - the normal stuff we judge on - How workable is the 'commonalit...

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: FD Archive Upload (finally!)

 Post subject: Re: FD Archive Upload (finally!) Posted: March 20th, 2020, 1:17 pm 

Replies: 63
Views: 34753


I am quite sure it could go there together with the sb parts, that is just a case of good labeling, similar to how the personal and AU designs sections have moved there as well. There are some fd components on the wiki already, and I am in the process of developing the FD components section further ...

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: FD Archive Upload (finally!)

 Post subject: Re: FD Archive Upload (finally!) Posted: March 17th, 2020, 3:34 pm 

Replies: 63
Views: 34753


Shouldn't parts and part sheets go on the wiki?
Great work!

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: USS Montana (BB-67) ca. 1988 Missile Augmentation

 Post subject: Re: USS Montana (BB-67) ca. 1988 Missile Augmentation Posted: March 15th, 2020, 8:30 am 

Replies: 11
Views: 5976


So this ship is converted directly from the WW2 configuration?

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: USS Montana (BB-67) ca. 1988 Missile Augmentation

 Post subject: Re: USS Montana (BB-67) ca. 1988 Missile Augmentation Posted: March 6th, 2020, 11:40 pm 

Replies: 11
Views: 5976


Well uhm.... While this is an interesting drawing, it deserves some more thought into it...... but I might be a bit late to the party for that. Note that the iowa's, when they got the ABL's, had them in 2 positions: on the sides of the aft superstructure and on the midship. The proposed 1990's VLS c...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: The Last Pre-dreadnought battleship Challenge

 Post subject: Re: The Last Pre-dreadnought battleship Challenge Posted: February 25th, 2020, 10:31 pm 

Replies: 24
Views: 15075


When the requirements for this challenge were set, there were some complaints that all the ships would get the same arrangement due to 'too restrictive' rules, and there would be no room for creativity in this challenge. I have now forgotten who were the people discussing this, and it does not matte...

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: Project CGN

 Post subject: Re: Project CGN Posted: February 4th, 2020, 8:11 am 

Replies: 14
Views: 6746


Well, gents, first of all, I definitely made an error: I trusted an source that on closer inspection ended up being a kitbash itself! so big changes will be coming. @ Colombamike, may I ask of you to keep the image up for some time (you normally delete them after a while) so I can use it when I retu...

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: Project CGN

 Post subject: Re: Project CGN Posted: January 28th, 2020, 6:47 am 

Replies: 14
Views: 6746


Well, that would put the SPY radar directly over the reactor hatch IIRC...... Which I suspect is the reason for that short superstructure
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 7197 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5720 »


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]