Search found 1401 matches

[ Search found 1401 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5141 »
Author Message

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: HMSAS Pretoria

 Post subject: Re: HMSAS Pretoria Posted: May 7th, 2018, 9:01 am 

Replies: 10
Views: 850


Hi, yes its definitely tight.... I was thinking that the Swordfish folded to under 18ft (cant find any others) so 44ft would give 8ft to play with, its only a very small funnel for 12k SHP so might fit? (it can be long and thin as no length concerns) As to the catapult, it will have to be retractabl...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: HMSAS Pretoria

 Post subject: Re: HMSAS Pretoria Posted: May 6th, 2018, 9:48 pm 

Replies: 10
Views: 850


[ img ]
With changes suggested.

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Fast battleship challenge!

 Post subject: Re: Fast battleship challenge! Posted: May 6th, 2018, 6:58 pm 

Replies: 73
Views: 6438


Why the one entry only per person?

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: SpringSharp tutorial!

 Post subject: Re: SpringSharp tutorial! Posted: May 6th, 2018, 5:40 pm 

Replies: 16
Views: 1164


Deskjetser has got a link on the Youtube video description to make it even easier.

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: SpringSharp tutorial!

 Post subject: Re: SpringSharp tutorial! Posted: May 6th, 2018, 5:28 pm 

Replies: 16
Views: 1164


It's a free download :D

(but its sometimes as reliable as that suggest :lol: )

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: HMSAS Pretoria

 Post subject: Re: HMSAS Pretoria Posted: May 6th, 2018, 12:45 pm 

Replies: 10
Views: 850


Thanks for the feedback,

Hood Yes and Yes, after BB1987 suggested it I have started a version with the fore deck much flatter to a brake. The TT will move under the 4" with the boats just on a platform between the funnel and aft structure.

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Fast battleship challenge!

 Post subject: Re: Fast battleship challenge! Posted: May 5th, 2018, 9:34 pm 

Replies: 73
Views: 6438


The problem is then how to get people to pick the limited short 14" window that actually was nearly critical time wise due to the start of WWII? What about simply making everybody justify why their ship is acceptable with the treaties and the give them a score for it? After all a most German, Italia...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Fast battleship challenge!

 Post subject: Re: Fast battleship challenge! Posted: May 5th, 2018, 9:03 pm 

Replies: 73
Views: 6438


No, 1923 WNT was 16" 35,000t (only a few named ships allowed till building list in 30s) 1930 LNT stoped building list but still 16"/35,000t even if no ships actually allowed for main powers RN/USN/IJN (this is why Italy/Fr/Ger started 15" ships) 1 Jan 1937 2LNT 14"/35,000t until escalator clause 16"...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: HMSAS Pretoria

 Post subject: Re: HMSAS Pretoria Posted: May 5th, 2018, 8:59 pm 

Replies: 10
Views: 850


Oh I've never seen a WW2(ish) era South African ship before! I was simply thinking about going cheaper than a Arethusa class for the treaty completion to be different and then had to think who would be unwilling to buy more.... Just annoyed that I was 5 days late and it still don't look great with ...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Fast battleship challenge!

 Post subject: Re: Fast battleship challenge! Posted: May 5th, 2018, 8:50 pm 

Replies: 73
Views: 6438


Combat capability: Surface defence Surface offence Air defence Manueverability Equipment One entry per person! A question is the combat capability graded by year LD and cost? Otherwise its simply a case that you have to pick the last date possible to get the most out? Of the previous the following ...
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 1401 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5141 »


Contact us | The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]