Search found 30 matches

[ Search found 30 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 »
Author Message

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: CG(X) option two 23,000 ton BMD CGN(X)

 Post subject: Re: CG(X) option two 23,000 ton BMD CGN(X) Posted: February 13th, 2014, 7:16 pm 

Replies: 117
Views: 77637


A handsome ship, sabotage181 . If only the United States Navy could afford to build 19 of them to replace the Ticonderoga -class guided-missile cruiser as originally planned for CG(X). Much nicer than the BMD ship based on the San Antonio -class LPD. I presume that this design will be dubbed Virgini...

 Forum: Sources and Reference Drawings  Topic: HII LPD-17 derived BMD platform

 Post subject: Re: HII LPD-17 derived BMD platform Posted: April 17th, 2013, 7:32 pm 

Replies: 19
Views: 11793


According to ex-Secretary of the Navy John Lehman, the BMD ship is tied to a specific region and cannot be deployed with a Carrier Strike Group (CSG).

Source:
http://smokeandstir.org/2012/10/25/weig ... ile-class/

 Forum: Sources and Reference Drawings  Topic: HII LPD-17 derived BMD platform

 Post subject: Re: HII LPD-17 derived BMD platform Posted: April 16th, 2013, 8:48 pm 

Replies: 19
Views: 11793


Does the powerplant of the LPD 17 need to be upgraded to increase the speed from 22 knots to 30 knots in the BMD concept so that it can be part of a Carrier Strike Group (CSG)?

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: CGBL

 Post subject: Re: CGBL Posted: April 11th, 2013, 4:33 pm 

Replies: 50
Views: 57176


Did the Bureau of Ships expect a new hull classification for the Mission Essential Unit (MEU)/CG VSTOL since the concept painting starts with 1? What might be the new hull classification? Or if it had been build would it have been added to the cruisers list as CGH xx?

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: Arleigh Burke Flight III

 Post subject: Re: Arleigh Burke Flight III Posted: March 19th, 2013, 8:32 pm 

Replies: 41
Views: 36797


I am also the same Triton here at these forums.

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: CGBL

 Post subject: Re: CGBL Posted: March 19th, 2013, 8:31 pm 

Replies: 50
Views: 57176


Very nice drawing, TJ.

 Forum: Sources and Reference Drawings  Topic: Gibbs & Cox Light Frigate

 Post subject: Gibbs & Cox Light Frigate Posted: October 11th, 2012, 7:34 pm 

Replies: 1
Views: 2875


Has anyone seen drawings of the Gibbs & Cox Light Frigate?

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: CVV

 Post subject: Re: CVV Posted: August 24th, 2012, 7:00 pm 

Replies: 42
Views: 31404


The CVV was intended to operate V/STOL aircraft. How about some additional V/SOL aircraft in the ship drawing? What about the Convair 200 V/STOL fighter? http://steeljawscribe.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/image/convair_200_1.jpg Rockwell XFV-12? http://steeljawscribe.com/wordpress/wp-content/upl...

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: arleigh burke concepts

 Post subject: Re: arleigh burke concepts Posted: August 7th, 2012, 5:20 pm 

Replies: 12
Views: 13571


Is the Flight nomenclature unique to the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer? Or have other ship classes used Flight I, Flight II, Flight III etc. to denote subclasses/variants? Anyone know the origin of the term Flight as applied to naval ships?

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: CGBL

 Post subject: Re: CGBL Posted: August 6th, 2012, 7:09 pm 

Replies: 50
Views: 57176


I was reading about the Battle of the Argonne Forest (September 26 – November 11, 1918), also known as the Meuse-Argonne Offensive: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meuse-Argonne_Offensive Although a decisive Allied Victory in World War I, the battle cost the lives of 26,277 Americans. It is known by so...
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 30 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 »


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]