Search found 1423 matches

[ Search found 1423 matches ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5143 »
Author Message

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: Dominion of Newfoundland and Labrador

 Post subject: Re: Dominion of Newfoundland and Labrador Posted: July 25th, 2018, 9:47 pm 

Replies: 62
Views: 28686


I like the improvements, may I suggest a few alterations? The engine room looks like it has port holes do you need to remove some under funnel? maybe as far back as the start of the stern superstructure? 34 - the .5 could be on each side for better arcs and potentially to make space for TT (FFBNW :-...

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: Dominion of Newfoundland and Labrador

 Post subject: Re: Dominion of Newfoundland and Labrador Posted: July 22nd, 2018, 9:32 pm 

Replies: 62
Views: 28686


I think they look very "blocky" and high for 30 DE? Specifically the enclosed bridge looks more CL than DE? http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/756 and I would land the TT etc so they don't count as DD tonnage for the LNT? I don't see why any of them would serve through after WWII as they would be wo...

 Forum: Real Designs  Topic: Arleigh Burke class

 Post subject: Re: Collection of the US Navy Posted: July 7th, 2018, 9:05 pm 

Replies: 43
Views: 15427


Well they are all gorgeous as I think we expect from you.

My only question was it a deliberate omission of missiles?
(its does look nice and clean even if it limits information?)

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: WIP AU personal designs

 Post subject: Re: WIP Cruiser Class Posted: July 7th, 2018, 6:44 pm 

Replies: 8
Views: 4290


Looks nice my questions would be, On CG - Do the bow thrusters make sense (155mm Mags and flow noise near sonar?) - Only two not three Marlin (ie is the rear one not actually two if it needs to stick out both sides?) ON FFG - Is the rear rib bay area sufficiently wide for Bay/funnel/Bay? (or just mo...

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: Scheme 59 Missile ships: Super Talos and SCANFAR

 Post subject: Re: Scheme 59 Missile ships: Super Talos and SCANFAR Posted: June 30th, 2018, 1:53 am 

Replies: 29
Views: 14896


Its certainly interesting and a great drawing.

Erik, I wonder how tight the landing pad is, what's the width of the rear superstructure? In service would they think of quickly fiting the empty Polaris area (assuming OTL none fitting to surface ships?) as a larger second landing/refuelling pad?

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: Lions

 Post subject: Re: Lions Posted: June 13th, 2018, 7:28 am 

Replies: 24
Views: 15877


Very nice addition! A question about the later versions would the "plausible 1943" ship not be more likely to be closer to the original laid down design than the later 42k design? Ie once the laid down hull is cancelled, reordered and delayed to the later design then its not going to get finished by...

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: The Dominion of Westralia

 Post subject: Re: The Dominion of Westralia Posted: June 13th, 2018, 7:21 am 

Replies: 85
Views: 47622


That or ditch the 4.5" twin as by late 60s its far less useful than the Mk22 (better for everything apart from shore bombardment), you could balance that with a 3" or just 57/40mm? for small junk bashing?

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: The Dominion of Westralia

 Post subject: Re: The Dominion of Westralia Posted: June 12th, 2018, 3:01 pm 

Replies: 85
Views: 47622


I think it looks much better my only question would be why keep the old 4.5" that late? The RN Mk8 or a USN 5" (42 or 45) would make more sense would it not? Or twin(MK6)/single(OTO) 3" to save weight?

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: Patentee, Civilian ship

 Post subject: Re: Patentee, Civilian ship Posted: June 6th, 2018, 9:35 pm 

Replies: 5
Views: 2362


Hi welcombe, First let me congratulate you for picking such a nice sensible ship to start with I certainly didn't.... :-P I would add, - Sadly you haven't saved it as PNG - I would reduce the double black lines on the masts and a few other places (funnel, stairs, boats, flagpole) and add them on the...

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: Scheme 59 Missile ships: Super Talos and SCANFAR

 Post subject: Re: Scheme 59 Missile ships: Super Talos and SCANFAR Posted: June 6th, 2018, 9:28 pm 

Replies: 29
Views: 14896


Can I ask the 4 advanced dish type radars on the DDG with two Mk 13 launchers are they placed side by side? Do you have any information on why and would it not limit substantially the arcs for using them all?

I don't see why when the DLG spreads them out more?
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 1423 matches ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5143 »


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]