Search found 1424 matches

[ Search found 1424 matches ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5143 »
Author Message

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: Scheme 59 Missile ships: Super Talos and SCANFAR

 Post subject: Re: Scheme 59 Missile ships: Super Talos and SCANFAR Posted: June 6th, 2018, 9:28 pm 

Replies: 29
Views: 14927


Can I ask the 4 advanced dish type radars on the DDG with two Mk 13 launchers are they placed side by side? Do you have any information on why and would it not limit substantially the arcs for using them all?

I don't see why when the DLG spreads them out more?

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge

 Post subject: Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge Posted: May 29th, 2018, 7:04 am 

Replies: 142
Views: 50331


The date is 1935 and the ship is in a Third World country to counter the Argentinian Admiral Brown heavy cruiser. In all Argentinian Navy there was only three floatplanes able to reconaissance duties. In the Brazilian Navy there was only one one torpedo bomber squadron able to coastal duties. In 19...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge

 Post subject: Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge Posted: May 28th, 2018, 8:01 pm 

Replies: 142
Views: 50331


I agree the shading is better my questions would be, 1- why so much light AA on the first one (what's the date?) 2- would a float plane not be better on the earlier one? 3- why raise up the DP guns 4- what is the director (DP?) behind the front funnel doing would its arcs not be very limited and cov...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: HMSAS Pretoria

 Post subject: Re: HMSAS Pretoria Posted: May 7th, 2018, 9:01 am 

Replies: 10
Views: 3923


Hi, yes its definitely tight.... I was thinking that the Swordfish folded to under 18ft (cant find any others) so 44ft would give 8ft to play with, its only a very small funnel for 12k SHP so might fit? (it can be long and thin as no length concerns) As to the catapult, it will have to be retractabl...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: HMSAS Pretoria

 Post subject: Re: HMSAS Pretoria Posted: May 6th, 2018, 9:48 pm 

Replies: 10
Views: 3923


[ img ]
With changes suggested.

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Fast battleship challenge! (Ended)

 Post subject: Re: Fast battleship challenge! Posted: May 6th, 2018, 6:58 pm 

Replies: 158
Views: 55007


Why the one entry only per person?

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: SpringSharp tutorial!

 Post subject: Re: SpringSharp tutorial! Posted: May 6th, 2018, 5:40 pm 

Replies: 16
Views: 7742


Deskjetser has got a link on the Youtube video description to make it even easier.

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: SpringSharp tutorial!

 Post subject: Re: SpringSharp tutorial! Posted: May 6th, 2018, 5:28 pm 

Replies: 16
Views: 7742


It's a free download :D

(but its sometimes as reliable as that suggest :lol: )

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: HMSAS Pretoria

 Post subject: Re: HMSAS Pretoria Posted: May 6th, 2018, 12:45 pm 

Replies: 10
Views: 3923


Thanks for the feedback,

Hood Yes and Yes, after BB1987 suggested it I have started a version with the fore deck much flatter to a brake. The TT will move under the 4" with the boats just on a platform between the funnel and aft structure.

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Fast battleship challenge! (Ended)

 Post subject: Re: Fast battleship challenge! Posted: May 5th, 2018, 9:34 pm 

Replies: 158
Views: 55007


The problem is then how to get people to pick the limited short 14" window that actually was nearly critical time wise due to the start of WWII? What about simply making everybody justify why their ship is acceptable with the treaties and the give them a score for it? After all a most German, Italia...
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 1424 matches ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5143 »


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]