Search found 371 matches

[ Search found 371 matches ]  Go to page « 132 33 34 35 3638 »
Author Message

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: Federation of Cenet

 Post subject: Re: Federation of Cenet Posted: September 9th, 2011, 11:39 pm 

Replies: 211
Views: 58145


I think on a ship this size, more twin secondary guns would be fine.

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: The Crowned Republic of Atlantia

 Post subject: Re: Parliamentary Republic of Atlantia Posted: September 8th, 2011, 9:59 pm 

Replies: 647
Views: 237242


I think the only problem so far is that the Boffins were designed a little later than 1942, but I guess you could get by with that.

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: Germano-British Empire

 Post subject: Re: Germano-British Empire Posted: September 7th, 2011, 10:58 pm 

Replies: 211
Views: 65371


Go with a twin 16" since you want a pair of massive guns not really useful on a ship this size. 20" is just completely unrealistic. Your best bet with it anyway would be a single fixed mount on an impossibly wide beam.

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: Germano-British Empire

 Post subject: Re: Germano-British Empire Posted: August 31st, 2011, 4:01 pm 

Replies: 211
Views: 65371


When you increase something as major as the hull, EVERY system of the vital to its operation (not the guns or weapons) sub must be increased in size proportionate to the change. Those dive-planes are puny and will only slow the ship down, rather than change its direction. And, adding aft torpedo tub...

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: Germano-British Empire

 Post subject: Re: Germano-British Empire Posted: August 30th, 2011, 4:03 pm 

Replies: 211
Views: 65371


You forgot to resize the rudder, props, and increase the amount of space in the ship above the waterline. The sub would get washed over in even calm seas, and eventually you would have a similar incident to the British M-class subs of the 20's.Also, if you want that much sheer below the waterline, y...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Cutlas class destroyer

 Post subject: Re: Cutlas class destroyer Posted: August 30th, 2011, 3:52 pm 

Replies: 21
Views: 8331


Is this for an AU or just for the heck of it?If its the latter, then it looks fine.

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: Rodondo's little Australian AU(1910-1950)

 Post subject: Re: Rodondo's little Australian AU(1910-1950) Posted: August 30th, 2011, 3:50 pm 

Replies: 76
Views: 27056


Will there be a full-hull version to come? It looks like a nice scouting submarine.

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Cutlas class destroyer

 Post subject: Re: Cutlas class destroyer Posted: August 29th, 2011, 5:25 pm 

Replies: 21
Views: 8331


Why would you want the enemy to clearly identify your ship from afar? That would most likely either get this ship sunk, or prove its just a destroyer, leaving larger vessels to take a greater punch.

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: Germano-British Empire

 Post subject: Re: Germano-British Empire Posted: August 29th, 2011, 5:23 pm 

Replies: 211
Views: 65371


Well, a turreted twin 4.5" gun on a submarine is impractical, especially when its on a submarine that barely has potential for coastal duty (ie: the shallow draft, and overall thin hull)

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Cutlas class destroyer

 Post subject: Re: Cutlas class destroyer Posted: August 29th, 2011, 12:32 am 

Replies: 21
Views: 8331


The animation is woefully out of scale.
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 371 matches ]  Go to page « 132 33 34 35 3638 »


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]