Search found 2779 matches

[ Search found 2779 matches ]  Go to page « 1260 261 262 263 264278 »
Author Message

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Destroyer/frigate

 Post subject: Re: Destroyer/frigate Posted: January 11th, 2011, 7:09 pm 

Replies: 92
Views: 57424


Your SPY-1 has a large blind spot aft due to blockage by the stacks (and, for that matter, by the Phalanx - why isn't a single centerline mount enough?).

Try again.

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Destroyer/frigate

 Post subject: Re: Destroyer/frigate Posted: January 10th, 2011, 11:41 pm 

Replies: 92
Views: 57424


Even if you're diesel, you have way way too little stack and uptake. And the phased array faces should absolutely be at 45deg to the centerline. Your current rudder arrangement won't allow a floodable dock. Neither will the 76/62 or VLS. I assume at this point that he's got a narrow RHIB bay on eith...

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: Québec Navy

 Post subject: Re: Québec Navy Posted: January 9th, 2011, 11:51 pm 

Replies: 66
Views: 49672


When you use large portions of another drawing, you are to credit the author. This is not optional.

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Destroyer/frigate

 Post subject: Re: Destroyer/frigate Posted: January 9th, 2011, 10:13 pm 

Replies: 92
Views: 57424


Ticos have two entirely distinct SPY-1 blocks for that reason - I suspect cable runs would be so bad as to be unfeasible. I don't see why the arrays could not be this separate, at least in principle. Handoffs between arrays would force some additional systems engineering efforts, particularly for de...

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: Bad times lately

 Post subject: Re: Bad times lately Posted: January 9th, 2011, 4:58 pm 

Replies: 7
Views: 5783


Sorry to hear it. Get better!

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Crazy huge CGN du jour

 Post subject: Re: Crazy huge CGN du jour Posted: January 9th, 2011, 3:32 pm 

Replies: 67
Views: 48391


Interesting; I didn't know such was ever tested. I'll need to revise mine! Exclusion of Harpoon canisters was a conscious AU-ish decision on my part. There are lots of places you could put them, but the idea never really excited me. Lord knows she'd sail with empty cells already (as is apparently qu...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Crazy huge CGN du jour

 Post subject: Re: Crazy huge CGN du jour Posted: January 9th, 2011, 2:58 am 

Replies: 67
Views: 48391


CB/BC = whatever.


Minor alterations. Not so much alterations as completions, I suppose. Flag bags and such minor detailing. I'm at the point where I need informed opinions to tell me what I've missed.

(deleted)

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: Design Study 381 & 382

 Post subject: Re: Design Study 381 & 382 Posted: January 8th, 2011, 5:32 pm 

Replies: 16
Views: 16317


No real major air search set on the Sea Dart variant? That seems implausible.

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: ...sub...surface CIWS?

 Post subject: Re: ...sub...surface CIWS? Posted: January 6th, 2011, 3:30 pm 

Replies: 12
Views: 11487


The RBU series is claimed to have a nonzero hard-kill anti-torpedo capability. How much greater than zero is not clear.

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Crazy huge CGN du jour

 Post subject: Re: Crazy huge CGN du jour Posted: January 3rd, 2011, 5:07 am 

Replies: 67
Views: 48391


Minor revisions and updates. Also, top views are not pleasant.

[ img ]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 2779 matches ]  Go to page « 1260 261 262 263 264278 »


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]