klagldsf and Heuhen would u maybe call it a battlecruiser considering its armament and speed or no because possible without a London and Washington naval treaty ( which im assuming Haram does not abide to or to a similar treaty) cruisers could have grown to this size
ohhh i was always wondering why the french used crotale but no gun CIWS and yeah thats what i was thinking with the phalanx but i never knew about water cooling very interesting insight. How does a system like the Millennium gun compare would it be like in between phalanx and dardo with a low rate o...
so to conclude the american 5/38 was your best bet for a prewar destroyer gun radar wise the information is too classified for a true comparison and it comes down to assorted prefrences gun wise its also assorted prefrences is this correct? one more question is their a single CIWS to prefer or they ...
so would it be possible to take the american 5"/38 or british 4.7" and create a true dual dual purpose mount also one more question how effective were the bofors guns used on Polish destroyers compared to these or to better re-frase the question what was the best destroyer gun and or mounting to use...
hmmm yes ik of both the 5"/25 however i read was more AA gun than dual purpose but i guess u could make a dual purpose mount with it and while the 4in. is excellant i feel its a little week for a destroyer i should have specified that thankyou very much everyone for these insights any others would b...
ahh my bad then
and area defense is more useful correct?
and when comparing the oto melara to the mk.45 so it depends on how much weight u can spend on your main gun