I like the look. It gives off the impression of the massiveness of a battleship conversion. A couple of comments with my opinions: You could probably make the stack smaller. The Colorado -class only had two stacks, so you could probably get away with a stack 2/3 the size of the one that you have cur...
Look for some examples and do some shading for the flare of the bow, also there are some double pixels at the stern. I'm not familiar with that class of vessel, but look at the details that were present on the actual vessel that weren't in the original drawing. I'd also try and give credit to the or...
I am not a good person to ask about Spring Sharp. I do not like the program at all. I feel it takes away peoples intelligence. By that I mean the ability to think for yourself. To actually go out and do by 'hand' the accruing of resources and references, from reading books, hunting online for obscu...
I like it. Couple of points, that forebridge superstructure has added a lot of topweight to the ship. To balance it out, by 1940-41 you would probably have removed the torpedo tubes to help compensate. That was something all of the older cruisers had a problem with. All the additional electronics a...
Looking good, I like the slow evolution of the class. I think by the time you reach the King Board refits you'd likely see gun #3 replaced with a second Mark 19 director platform. This also made me realize there's no after/emergency conn on this ship ("Battle 2"), and that would probably need to go...
Quick links
FAQ
Register
Login![[ img ]](https://i.imgur.com/jubM0fA.png)