the armored belt was an little mistake of me... I have fixed it already. and grey underwater hull looks good on it as well, was that the real colour of those ships back then?
thanks for the colours for the ship as well, I might do it in both victorian and grey colours
Great job! I would like to add some comments. Please take them as suggestions and/or personal opinion. First of all it is an "ideal" ship and the main goal of Cuniberti was to introduce and to discuss the concept of a monocaliber Battleship. So I would not add too many details to the original drawi...
A pretty high quality drawing of the Hawker Pr.1216 has already been done, check the "What If and Never-Built Planes" chart on the Shipbucket photobucket page. damnit... but it is slightly wrong on some points. as I'll have to redraw mine anyway, I might as well start with that one. I haven't check...
mitch, why do you think this is aimed directly at you? you are starting to defence yourself with this post, which is not needed IMO. he is right about the fact that we should concentrate on drawing parts that are not yet drawn, and only improve parts that really need that!
about the parts sheets: I think there should come parts sheets for country's and company's that produce those. I am working on the dutch one(togheter with some other people, and if more people do so the parts sheets might be a whole lot easier to navigate through.