Nope. Ground effect, similar, but not the same. It's a bit like a catamaran with an ACV strapped to its underbelly. It has many of the advantages of an ACV, though it isn't amphibious, however, due to the fact that the side hulls pierces the water, it's far more stable and can use more conventional ...
Ground Effect FAC.png A little something I threw together as an exercise. This is my first attempt at drawing camouflage, so I'm especially interested in anything you might have to say about it, Armament consists of one Bofors 57mm Mk 3, four Saab RBS-15's and 12 ESSMs. So, critique away. Oh, and i...
For the ASW version :shock: :o Inthinkable to see depth charge in "air" storage aft, simply on fligth deck (extremely dangerous). Even a only one north korean snipper, with a powerfull good rifle (maybe a 12,7mm long caliber rifle), can be destroy this entire ship by ignitiate aft depth charge :rol...
Yes. I'm currently working on a pre MMA refit drawing. That was when they got their funnels. Before then they had a stern exhaust system, but is was a PITA. Especially on the Type A's since they had gas turbines.
There's no way to make that abomination look better. I've seen barges with more grace.
Ans pleas, please change your signature colour. It feels like someone is gouging out my eyeballs every time I look at it.
I'm thinking Sunburn (SS-N-22, or P-270 Moskit) or Shipwreck (SS-N-19, or P-700 Granit) target myself. It is also and UNREP ship as well, which I would say we need if not for the fact that the T-AKE program is ahead of schedule and under-budget.
Quick links
FAQ
Register
Login