Search found 446 matches

[ Search found 446 matches ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 645 »
Author Message

 Forum: Non-Shipbucket Drawings  Topic: Spacebucket

 Post subject: Re: Spacebucket Posted: August 13th, 2013, 2:23 pm 

Replies: 326
Views: 1158436


And now for something along other lines, which should be blatantly obvious as to what it is...

[ img ]

 Forum: Parts Sheets Discussion  Topic: Top down view aircraft

 Post subject: Re: Top down view aircraft Posted: August 10th, 2013, 4:47 am 

Replies: 13
Views: 22763


Stick with the one TimothyC posted for now, that large one messed up as whoever did it used the wrong measurements. Found that our when I was working on my Chinook/NH-90 hybrid.

 Forum: Non-Shipbucket Drawings  Topic: Spacebucket

 Post subject: Re: Spacebucket Posted: August 2nd, 2013, 8:57 am 

Replies: 326
Views: 1158436


[ img ]

Should be obvious now :p

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: Uncredited SB drawings

 Post subject: Re: Uncredited SB drawings Posted: July 28th, 2013, 8:23 am 

Replies: 256
Views: 134104


http://www.newdeep.nl/jss-karel-doorman.html

Here's another one, the Dutch again.

 Forum: Non-Shipbucket Drawings  Topic: Spacebucket

 Post subject: Re: Spacebucket Posted: July 28th, 2013, 12:46 am 

Replies: 326
Views: 1158436


[ img ]

Just a tease as to what is to come....

 Forum: Non-Shipbucket Drawings  Topic: Shipright's Aurora Ships

 Post subject: Re: Shipright's Aurora Ships Posted: June 25th, 2013, 12:46 pm 

Replies: 25
Views: 32605


Realistically, I highly doubt you'd be able to fit 20 people on that ship and have enough resources for them. Orbital mechanics will require you to carry everything you need with you as waypoints in space without a known, stable gravity point like a planet or moon simply does not work. Also, what ty...

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: CG(X) option two 23,000 ton BMD CGN(X)

 Post subject: Re: CG(X) option two 23,000 ton BMD CGN(X) Posted: June 17th, 2013, 4:54 am 

Replies: 117
Views: 77622


We already have top views for the Mk41 VLS. here

As for the rest, well... Here's an example. My advice is not to color anything until you got the outlines.

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: CG(X) option two 23,000 ton BMD CGN(X)

 Post subject: Re: CG(X) option two 23,000 ton BMD CGN(X) Posted: June 16th, 2013, 2:31 am 

Replies: 117
Views: 77622


Personally, I think going to the internal RHIB holding was a step back. I quite liked it in the open as it gave the ship the feel that the designers wasn't trying to goldplate it over what the Burke has, it had a mission, and it was going to do it.

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: CG(X) option two 23,000 ton BMD CGN(X)

 Post subject: Re: CG(X) option two 23,000 ton BMD CGN(X) Posted: June 8th, 2013, 3:07 am 

Replies: 117
Views: 77622


CGN's all it needs, see nothing special that would require a new designation. However this is the USN and they love new designations...

Still say the Burke Mast looks better.

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: Maersk Triple-E

 Post subject: Re: Maersk Triple-E Posted: June 8th, 2013, 3:01 am 

Replies: 16
Views: 10231


Looks like it's sinking with the way the bow's lifting out of the water. lol
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 446 matches ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 645 »


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]