Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 5  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »
Author Message
Ashley
Post subject: Re: French armoured cruiser Latouche-TrévillePosted: November 22nd, 2010, 8:13 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
Colombamike wrote:
:o arfffffffffffff :cry:
Sorry Mike, but the French once knew how to build a really ugly ship. Later they did it very much better but those armored cruisers of the late 19th... :shock: :cry: :lol:

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BrockPaine
Post subject: Re: French armoured cruiser Latouche-TrévillePosted: November 22nd, 2010, 9:56 pm
Offline
Posts: 248
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 1:20 pm
I don't think this particular ship is all that ugly, really.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: French armoured cruiser Latouche-TrévillePosted: November 22nd, 2010, 10:01 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Ashley wrote:
Sorry Mike, but the French once knew how to build a really ugly ship. Later they did it very much better but those armored cruisers of the late 19th... :shock: :cry: :lol:
The French ships are not ugly IMHO, but odd looking, a certain look about them which says "bonne journée, je suis ici,regarde-moi" ;)

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: French armoured cruiser Latouche-TrévillePosted: November 23rd, 2010, 7:35 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Re the topedo tubes, I'm not sure why you've chosen to angle them, as it was the light Hotchkiss guns in the masts which I suggested you show fore and aft. Re the scuttles, sorry, but I don't buy that they would be of two diferent sizes immediately above each other, and why the darker shading around them? Just one last point: you've shown shading on the verticle surfaces, to indicate a curve? That is good, but you need to show as the light coming from one diretction - from the bow aft is the norm, so you'd have a lighter shade to the front but leaving the darker shade to the rear. I would still darken the shading on some of the overhangs as in some places it just doesn't show that well; and I would still show more of a diference in hue between the hull and the superstructure.

My last comment :)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
WhyMe
Post subject: Re: French armoured cruiser Latouche-TrévillePosted: November 23rd, 2010, 2:07 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1616
Joined: November 12th, 2010, 4:27 pm
Location: California, USA
Contact: Website
Portsmouth Bill wrote:
Re the topedo tubes, I'm not sure why you've chosen to angle them
Me neither... I guess I just misunderstood you :roll:
Portsmouth Bill wrote:
Re the scuttles, sorry, but I don't buy that they would be of two diferent sizes immediately above each other, and why the darker shading around them?
Here, a picture is worth a thousand words :)
Attachment:
Latouche-Treville scuttles.jpg
Portsmouth Bill wrote:
Just one last point: you've shown shading on the verticle surfaces, to indicate a curve? That is good, but you need to show as the light coming from one diretction
I kind of thought that the light is coming directly from above... As for shading on the turrets - that's because of their oval shape:
Attachment:
Latouche-Treville turrets.jpg
So, I guess this is the final version unless something major comes up.
Attachment:
ACR Latouche-Treville.png

_________________
Worklist: Portuguese Navy and Barnegat class seaplane tenders


Last edited by WhyMe on November 23rd, 2010, 3:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BrockPaine
Post subject: Re: French armoured cruiser Latouche-TrévillePosted: November 23rd, 2010, 2:40 pm
Offline
Posts: 248
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 1:20 pm
I like it. Good job on the work!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: French armoured cruiser Latouche-TrévillePosted: November 23rd, 2010, 8:23 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Some style issues which are glaringly obvious:
one the gun-tube (barrels if you so inclined to call them) shoul be the same color of the turret.
Shading of the aft turret is wrong as PB pointed out, it should be shaded as if the light is coming from the bows. That meant a lighter shade in the side closer to the bows and a darker shade for the side closer to the stern.
The ladders are wrong in style in the parts sheet Here there are some parts that are used generally in all ships be they from France, Germany or the former Soviet Union, ladders are like this as well as railings and doors as well as scuttles/portholes.
All in all you have made fine progress, as French 19th century ships are not easy to draw.

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
WhyMe
Post subject: Re: French armoured cruiser Latouche-TrévillePosted: November 23rd, 2010, 9:08 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1616
Joined: November 12th, 2010, 4:27 pm
Location: California, USA
Contact: Website
Thanks for the constructive critique; I will certainly fix the problems mentioned. Although I'm not sure about one thing:
Novice wrote:
as well as railings and doors as well as scuttles/portholes.
Are you saying that doors and scuttles a also wrong or those are just examples of standard things?

_________________
Worklist: Portuguese Navy and Barnegat class seaplane tenders


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: French armoured cruiser Latouche-TrévillePosted: November 23rd, 2010, 11:27 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
WhyMe wrote:
Thanks for the constructive critique; I will certainly fix the problems mentioned. Although I'm not sure about one thing:
Novice wrote:
as well as railings and doors as well as scuttles/portholes.
Are you saying that doors and scuttles a also wrong or those are just examples of standard things?
There are NO standard doors, scuttles, and portholes. There are so many variations of those that each class of ship (especially older ones like this) has it's own dimensions regarding these. The ones on the style sheet are useful references, or for if you simply don't have the details of the real thing.

Railings are tougher. You've used a standard railing, but in a couple of places (front lifeboat setup) your ropework runs in front of the railing, and since you've used exactly the same color for that there is some confusion.
Mind you, if a railing was of a really unusual design and you think you can draw that, don't hesitate to do so. I did a lot of work on the new railings for the LCF, especially in the front. Looks great, but not something for the faint of heart. You've got to know what you're doing when pulling out the kind of tricks I did. Just be consequent in your application of your work, don't mix two styles of anything unless there's a really good reason.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
WhyMe
Post subject: Re: French armoured cruiser Latouche-TrévillePosted: November 23rd, 2010, 11:47 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1616
Joined: November 12th, 2010, 4:27 pm
Location: California, USA
Contact: Website
The railings are pretty generic on this ship but thanks for the advice! Btw is there a standard color for ropework? If no, can you suggest on that?

Ok, I've fixed ladders, railings, guns, ropeworks, searchlights and shading: [ img ]

_________________
Worklist: Portuguese Navy and Barnegat class seaplane tenders


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 5  [ 42 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]