Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 1  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
RP1
Post subject: Qinetiq Sea Fury TrimaranPosted: May 10th, 2012, 9:46 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 208
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:48 pm
Location: Engerlands
Contact: Website
From 2003, the "Sea Fury" Trimaran design:

[ img ]

• Proposed for FSC, LCS, USCG Deepwater.
• 45 knots maximum / 20 knots cruise.
• 2734 tonnes deep load
• Upperdeck mission bays either side of the centreline superstructure, with space for 12 40-foot containers. In this case, the forward pair are enclosed by removable panels, the second pair are shown and the last position is taken up by a USV. The source just shows the baseline weapons - 57mm, CIWS, Scout radar and a hangar for SH-60 - which should roughly equate to the combination shown here.

Reference: Short, B, "QinetiQ Trimaran Demonstrator - RV Triton", 2003

- RP1

_________________
"Yes siree, the excitement never stops." Togusa, Ghost in the Shell


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
LEUT_East
Post subject: Re: Qinetiq Sea Fury TrimaranPosted: May 10th, 2012, 11:59 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 915
Joined: December 29th, 2011, 7:27 am
Location: Queensland, Australia
Wow, how nice is this design!

_________________
There is no "I" in TEAM but there is a ME

[ img ]
______________________
Current Worklist:
Redrawing my entire AU after a long absence from Shipbucket


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
gordo8000
Post subject: Re: Qinetiq Sea Fury TrimaranPosted: May 11th, 2012, 3:55 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 511
Joined: July 1st, 2011, 2:18 am
Location: Chillin with my wolf pack in Siberia.
So instead of props, its powered by a water jet?

_________________
Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked.
Korean AU


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
RP1
Post subject: Re: Qinetiq Sea Fury TrimaranPosted: May 11th, 2012, 1:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 208
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:48 pm
Location: Engerlands
Contact: Website
@gordo8000: Yes, a 42MW (!) waterjet in the main hull and a 9MW waterjet in either side hull. Some kind of ducted propeller is shown under the side hulls, also.

RP1

_________________
"Yes siree, the excitement never stops." Togusa, Ghost in the Shell


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
gordo8000
Post subject: Re: Qinetiq Sea Fury TrimaranPosted: May 11th, 2012, 2:44 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 511
Joined: July 1st, 2011, 2:18 am
Location: Chillin with my wolf pack in Siberia.
I've always heard that water jets were not good for anything larger than an FAC. Shows what I know. :lol:

_________________
Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked.
Korean AU


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Qinetiq Sea Fury TrimaranPosted: May 11th, 2012, 6:48 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9065
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
gordo8000 wrote:
I've always heard that water jets were not good for anything larger than an FAC. Shows what I know. :lol:
It depends on the hull.

Can water jet be used:

On a classic single hull: Up to a certain size (FAC) (Not you have a type of advance water jets, water jets that are more like a High speed fan/propellers build in a tub in to the hull!)
Catamaran: A bit larger than FAC
Hull like the pic. above: The hull is small, that make it more easy to move forward and that means less pressure on water jets. So you can easy go up to the 200 meters mark


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
RP1
Post subject: Re: Qinetiq Sea Fury TrimaranPosted: May 11th, 2012, 9:30 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 208
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:48 pm
Location: Engerlands
Contact: Website
Regarding waterjets;

There isn't really a size limit on conventional axial or mixed flow waterjets per se, with regards to ship or jet size. It is more of a limit on the practicality of how much power one can put into a hull. Waterjets are more efficient at higher speeds - both due to the fundamentals of the jet unit itself and due to the elimination of shaft lines, brackets and rudders, but these high speeds are more usually reached by smaller craft.

Large waterjets of tens of megawatts are completely practical, but obviously have their own unique design impacts. Consider the data here: http://www.rolls-royce.com/marine/produ ... waterjets/

You should find that the data lends itself to some easy scaling based on input power - i.e. a large waterjet is in many ways just a bigger small waterjet. This is not as obvious as it seems, as some technologies do not scale well.

Large waterjets require a very heavy unit at the extreme stern of the vessel, which represents a challenge in terms of structural integration and maintenance of trim. For "boost" waterjets, which are only used for high speeds - as in this design or in the South African MEKO corvettes, the boost waterjet can greatly increase drag - due to the opening - when not in use. Doors can of course solve this, but add more complexity.

The Advanced Waterjet to which Heuhen refers is described here: http://media.bmt.org/bmt_media/resource ... orINEC.pdf

- RP1

_________________
"Yes siree, the excitement never stops." Togusa, Ghost in the Shell


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Qinetiq Sea Fury TrimaranPosted: May 11th, 2012, 10:06 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9065
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Thx for the PDF RP1 I did know about the system but haven't seen any information about it, and like that part about power requirement at High speed but not at low speed!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
RP1
Post subject: Re: Qinetiq Sea Fury TrimaranPosted: May 11th, 2012, 10:11 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 208
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:48 pm
Location: Engerlands
Contact: Website
With regards to power, propulsion etc I would recommend the papers by David Bricknell from RR. He usually provides some useful data on typical power-displacement ratios, which Shipbucketeers could apply to see if their ships are "typical" or are moving outside the normal range - which does not mean they are impossible, of course.

The only paper I could find was here: http://www.ingenierosnavales.com/docure ... 073-79.pdf

Which is quite readable. He's also notable has being the only waterjet salesman who doesn't tell you to buy waterjets...

RP1

_________________
"Yes siree, the excitement never stops." Togusa, Ghost in the Shell


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Qinetiq Sea Fury TrimaranPosted: May 12th, 2012, 8:58 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Quite fascinating. Thanks for posting these.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 1  [ 10 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs”

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]