Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 3  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 »
Author Message
jezza
Post subject: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 17th, 2013, 8:33 am
Offline
Posts: 42
Joined: January 23rd, 2012, 12:30 pm
[ img ]

I've taken a guess at the crane, but there's really only one CG render to go on for this one.

What do you think?

Edit: Image updated


Last edited by jezza on January 20th, 2013, 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 17th, 2013, 8:49 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7496
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
are you sure it has to be SLQ-32 (v) 3? I would think it would be an (v) 2, but I might be wrong
your Mk 49 RAM launchers are the wrong way around, and I would like it if you would use the latest one https://dl.dropbox.com/u/63276563/Mk%20 ... uncher.png
other then that, it looks quite nice to me.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gator_Country
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 17th, 2013, 2:19 pm
Offline
Posts: 99
Joined: May 21st, 2012, 9:05 pm
Location: The American South
Heck no, I hate the new RAM launcher. And the ship looks good, jezza. I came up with an LSD modification of San Antonio myself, but it's cool to see another concept that's real. I do wish they would enlarge the well deck, however. Looks good.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
DG_Alpha
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 17th, 2013, 2:27 pm
Offline
Posts: 762
Joined: January 1st, 2012, 7:01 pm
Location: Germany
Can't say anything about these system, since it's not my forte, but overall, it makes a good impression. One thing, though: The crane seems to use a different color palette from the rest of the ship, which makes it stand out a bit.

_________________
My worklist
Any help and source material is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 17th, 2013, 6:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Gator_Country wrote:
Heck no, I hate the new RAM launcher. And the ship looks good, jezza. I came up with an LSD modification of San Antonio myself, but it's cool to see another concept that's real. I do wish they would enlarge the well deck, however. Looks good.
What do not like about the new RAM launcher?

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 17th, 2013, 8:00 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I agree with Gator. I don't think the new one is much better than the old one.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Philbob
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 18th, 2013, 4:16 am
Offline
Posts: 586
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 3:45 am
want to create a notional medical frigate and BMD ship?

_________________
Supreme Commander of the Astrofleets


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gator_Country
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 18th, 2013, 1:13 pm
Offline
Posts: 99
Joined: May 21st, 2012, 9:05 pm
Location: The American South
Eh, I just don't like dimensions, not to mention the color palette. That, and the new CIWS make it hard to recolor them, 'cause they have forty-nine different shades of haze gray. I'll stick with the old one, same as I have with CIWS.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 18th, 2013, 5:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7496
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
you know the new RAM drawing has exactly the same dimensions the original, right? it was only reshaded and redetailed.
also, the RAM is an system that I have never seen in any paintjob that differs from the one I have drawn, so I see no need to recolour.

but what really is my point here: you say you hate it, ok. but I see no reason why jezza could not place it on HIS drawing, but only reasons why you don't want to use it. that is something else, right?
it is up to jezza if he wants to use the old or the new one, isn't it?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 18th, 2013, 7:19 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Plus the idea is to make the object look like its real counterpart, not make it look prettier.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 3  [ 29 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page 1 2 3 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]