Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 28 of 58  [ 573 posts ]  Go to page « 126 27 28 29 3058 »
Author Message
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)Posted: February 9th, 2016, 11:49 pm
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
I like the idea of a triple 5.5" turret. This gives your cruisers a good main armament, which would be the equal of most CL's of the time.

The only question I would have is over the height of the funnels, which look a lot shorter than the Agano class which your CL's resemble.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)Posted: February 9th, 2016, 11:56 pm
Offline
Posts: 3877
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
Beautiful work! LOVE the camo schemes!

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)Posted: February 10th, 2016, 12:55 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2816
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
Krakatoa wrote:
The only question I would have is over the height of the funnels, which look a lot shorter than the Agano class which your CL's resemble.
Thechnically, the funnel is higher than that of Japanese light cruiser disegns of the same timeframe. The Agano with it's higher funnel is a later design. Still, I might give a try and see how a taller funnel looks on those cruisers, I might even get away with it as a design flaw that required the ships to have the funnels heightened a bit to avoid some smoke intoxication for the recon plane pilots. Sounds quite nice and beliavable now that I think of!
Stay tuned, I'll may change some things tomorrow. And thanks for the imput. :)

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)Posted: February 10th, 2016, 8:54 am
Offline
Posts: 7164
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Another excellent addition, the design looks very good and the history and camo schemes are excellent as usual.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)Posted: February 10th, 2016, 10:11 am
Offline
Posts: 2741
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
As ever, you find a way to make Japanese outline ships not horrendous to look at.

That triple 140mm gives me an idea for a stepping stone cruiser too.

_________________
AU Projects: | Federal Monarchy of Tír Glas| Other Ivernic Nations | Artemis Group |
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)Posted: February 10th, 2016, 12:25 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2816
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
Hi all.

I've modified all drawings except for Kazami as built. Now the funnels are higher and their height issue has stuck in their backstories as an early design flaw.

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)Posted: February 10th, 2016, 3:52 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
I wonder if efforts would be made to make a 5.5" triple a DP mount. I also wonder how successful those efforts might be in that era.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Tobius
Post subject: Re: Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)Posted: February 10th, 2016, 4:09 pm
Offline
Posts: 545
Joined: July 21st, 2015, 2:10 pm
erik_t wrote:
I wonder if efforts would be made to make a 5.5" triple a DP mount. I also wonder how successful those efforts might be in that era.
Depends on the weight of the shell. The USN tried for a 6 inch DP naval gun.

http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_6-47DP_mk16.htm

How successful they were, I do not know. The article implies that there were issues in the feed system.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)Posted: February 10th, 2016, 4:27 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
I mean, I said "in that era" for a reason. The Mk 16 came into being with the full benefit of the experience of both American and British efforts to make a useful 4.5-6" DP mount, and in particular I think the weaknesses of the 5.25" on the KGVs and the 6" on the British cruisers.

Many powers designed and built large-caliber DP mounts that were ultimately too slow-loading or too ponderous to be useful against the higher performance aircraft that started appearing in the early 1940s.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Tobius
Post subject: Re: Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)Posted: February 10th, 2016, 4:59 pm
Offline
Posts: 545
Joined: July 21st, 2015, 2:10 pm
erik_t wrote:
I mean, I said "in that era" for a reason. The Mk 16 came into being with the full benefit of the experience of both American and British efforts to make a useful 4.5-6" DP mount, and in particular I think the weaknesses of the 5.25" on the KGVs and the 6" on the British cruisers.

Many powers designed and built large-caliber DP mounts that were ultimately too slow-loading or too ponderous to be useful against the higher performance aircraft that started appearing in the early 1940s.
That era includes the Mark 16 (It was a 1937 designed gun mount that is descended from the Mark 8 six inch bore predecessor). I do not pretend to know exactly why the US gun failed, but I do know historically that it was not considered a success and that down to the present many other attempts to produce a high angle (or articulated) mount for large bore weapons greater than 12.5 cm in diameter have met with an equally remarkable lack of success. There are exceptions like the Borfors 12 and 16 cm mortars that are popular with armies today, but those are the exceptions to what seems to be a general mechanical rule. The handling gear fails at some critical threshold shell weight line it appears.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 28 of 58  [ 573 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 126 27 28 29 3058 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 92 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]