» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 1  [ 10 posts ] 
[Print view]
Author Message
heuhen
Post subject: Vigra class cruiserPosted: August 19th, 2011, 7:31 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9065
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Just something I threw together, I know I'm missing mooring equipment

There are many solutions for hull, it's just finding the solution that fits!

Vigra class Batch 1A
[ img ]

Weapon:
3*Oto Melara 127 mm Compact
4*Oto Melara 40mm/70 Twin Compact Dardo
8*RGM-84 Harpoon missile (8 in spare)
3*MK 26 GMLS (RIM-66 Standard 2MR & Tomahawk)
1*MK 25 (RIM-7 E Sea Sparrow)
8*12,7mm gun
2*MK32 SVTT


Vigra class Batch 2A
[ img ]

Weapon:
2*Oto Melara 127 mm Compact
2Oto Melara 40mm/70 Twin Compact Dardo
8*RGM-84 Harpoon missile (8 in spare)
3*MK 26 GMLS (RIM-66 Standard 2MR & Tomahawk)
1*MK 29 (RIM-7M Sea Sparrow)
8*12,7mm gun
2*MK32 SVTT
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Vigra class cruiserPosted: August 19th, 2011, 8:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
  1. The aft most Mk-26 isn't going to fit there (not enough hull volume)
  2. The Mk-25/29 launchers are redundant. There were no ships ever launched with both a Mk-26 and a Mk-29.
  3. Even then, you have the Mk-29 facing boward not aft. The railings are behind the central pillar, not in front of it.
  4. Mk-26s can't fire TLAMs - it's a dimensions thing.
  5. As far as I know, there were never any proposed designs for a ship that had more than two Mk-26 GMLS units. If you must keep the mount that is furthest aft (which is the one I'd get rid of), then you should have more than 4 SPG-51 radars.

_________________
πŒπ€π“π‡ππ„π“- 𝑻𝒐 π‘ͺπ’π’ˆπ’Šπ’•π’‚π’•π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Vigra class cruiserPosted: August 19th, 2011, 9:34 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9065
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
TimothyC wrote:
  1. The aft most Mk-26 isn't going to fit there (not enough hull volume)
  2. The Mk-25/29 launchers are redundant. There were no ships ever launched with both a Mk-26 and a Mk-29.
  3. Even then, you have the Mk-29 facing boward not aft. The railings are behind the central pillar, not in front of it.
  4. Mk-26s can't fire TLAMs - it's a dimensions thing.
  5. As far as I know, there were never any proposed designs for a ship that had more than two Mk-26 GMLS units. If you must keep the mount that is furthest aft (which is the one I'd get rid of), then you should have more than 4 SPG-51 radars.
i'll redo it a bit!
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Vigra class cruiserPosted: August 19th, 2011, 10:14 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
I know ... stupid and stuff but when I first time see this topic it was like "Viagra class ... " and ... whaaaaa ? :shock: Couple of seconds later Vigra, VIGRA! class cruiser. :D

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Vigra class cruiserPosted: August 20th, 2011, 2:36 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9065
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Rhade wrote:
I know ... stupid and stuff but when I first time see this topic it was like "Viagra class ... " and ... whaaaaa ? :shock: Couple of seconds later Vigra, VIGRA! class cruiser. :D
congratulations! you managed to make me laugh a bit! :D
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Vigra class cruiserPosted: August 20th, 2011, 8:10 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
You're welcome. :D

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Vigra class cruiserPosted: August 20th, 2011, 4:29 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9065
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
updated it a bit:

Vigra class Batch 1A
[ img ]

Vigra class 2A
[ img ]

vigra class 2B
[ img ]
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Vigra class cruiserPosted: August 20th, 2011, 10:57 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
On the Batch 2A there is no reason for both a Mk-26 and an Mk-15 forward. The Mk-26 can fire ASROCs, and you have enough volume there for probably a full 64 round mount. I'm still not sold on the inclusion of both NSSM and SM-2s, as I can't find an instance of both being deployed on one ship.

_________________
πŒπ€π“π‡ππ„π“- 𝑻𝒐 π‘ͺπ’π’ˆπ’Šπ’•π’‚π’•π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Vigra class cruiserPosted: August 21st, 2011, 1:15 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
I'm not sure why you've got a blast shield behind the aft 127mm mount, but not behind the aft twin sam mount? I would of expected the reverse.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Vigra class cruiserPosted: August 21st, 2011, 1:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9065
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Portsmouth Bill wrote:
I'm not sure why you've got a blast shield behind the aft 127mm mount, but not behind the aft twin sam mount? I would of expected the reverse.
easy fix
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 1  [ 10 posts ]  Return to β€œPersonal Designs”

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]