Shipbucket.com

Official Forum
It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 8:58 am

All times are UTC


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1249 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52 ... 125  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor Designs
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:47 am
Posts: 1512
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
Carthaginian wrote:
That's the purpose of the belt extending so far down?
That's at least twice as far below the waterline as a contemporary ship's belt would go.


Part belt/part bulge combination.

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor Designs
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:25 pm
Posts: 4645
Location: the netherlands
seeing the speed of the gun development during those years and the fact that the dante was build by an designer who was far ahead of his time on several occasions (http://www.shipbucket.com/images.php?di ... iberti.png)
(http://www.shipbucket.com/Never%20Built ... iberti.png) so I would say the same as thiel.

also, the USN used the first tripple turret in 1916 and the british not before WW1 ended....

_________________
please ask before using my drawings. if I know you can make something that can float of it I will say yes, and will even give some words of advice if needed.
Image
my worklist my newest drawings are credited with J.Scholtens


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor Designs
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:47 am
Posts: 1512
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
I am not quite understanding the discussion/disagreement. This does not have triple turrets. All I said was that it was designed for two triples, which did not exist at that time so they used twins. I would also like to remind folks this is not Earth, not the UK, not the US, and that while the timelines may be similar, they are not identical.

I am fully aware of when the first triple turrets were developed and used in the real world, I have been studying naval history since, honestly, before some of you were born. :lol:

So, I would appreciate if this tangent of the discussion was terminated because argueing over something which did not happen is rather pointless, don't you think? I would rather discuss points of the actual design and possible improvements, not the exact specific dates in the real world something happened because of one sentence in my narrative.

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor Designs
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:47 am
Posts: 1512
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
Biancini1995 wrote:
Looks like the Agincourt because of the superstructure but it's a nice draw ;)


Actually based more off the German Helgoland than the British Agincourt, but the Agincourt was the original inspiration.

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor Designs
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 10:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:02 am
Posts: 4244
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Zephyr wrote:
All I said was that it was designed for two triples,

That's were the problem lies. You're laying down ships well before triple turrets were even a twinkle in the designers eyes.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor Designs
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 10:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:42 am
Posts: 1326
Thiel wrote:
That's were the problem lies. You're laying down ships well before triple turrets were even a twinkle in the designers eyes.


Zephyr wrote:
I would also like to remind folks this is not Earth, not the UK, not the US, and that while the timelines may be similar, they are not identical.

_________________
Have a look at my AU-----> viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1739


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor Designs
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:25 pm
Posts: 587
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.
Thiel wrote:
Zephyr wrote:
All I said was that it was designed for two triples,

That's were the problem lies. You're laying down ships well before triple turrets were even a twinkle in the designers eyes.


No, he's not. :(
The Russian Gangut class was laid down at the same time.
Sevastopol, in specific, was actually laid down in 1906, built for triple turrets.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor Designs
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:47 am
Posts: 1512
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
Drawing tweaked and edited a bit.

OK, is there anything I'm missing?

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor Designs
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 4:29 am
Posts: 731
Location: Tralfamadore
its up to you but you may want to fit a few smaller caliber 4-3 inchers as extra torpedo defense and defense against air attack but i dont know if you nation has those concerns

_________________
Worklist
Macae class OPV
Fearless 65 and 75
Namibia Brendan Simbwaye P 11 OPV
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
HTMS Pattani
WW2 Thai Navy (as many ships as recourses and time permits)
References and feedback is always welcome!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor Designs
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:47 am
Posts: 1512
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
Trojan wrote:
its up to you but you may want to fit a few smaller caliber 4-3 inchers as extra torpedo defense and defense against air attack but i dont know if you nation has those concerns


Air attack in 1913 was not a large concern. I would imagine that at a later date more AA might be fitted. Anti-torpedoboat, though, probably so.

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1249 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52 ... 125  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group