Posts:7497 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
that grey outlined SPY-1 arrays should not be done like that, the hul shading is way too excssive (and IMO, does not show the shape of the hull corectly) and what have you done with the directors!
also, the concept art shown no phalanx and the gun back has some stuff I have not drawn on it.... :S
to be accurate, this should be Fl IIB, not IIIB.
not to be rude or something, but you have gone that far that this belongs in non-shipbucket section, IMO.
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin
Posts:2105 Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
It`s nice to see my drawing is used as inspiration for others. All Flight IIA are to be fitted with the Phalanx by 2013, so I don`t see why any future versions should`t have it. You can remove one Phalanx and replace it with a RAM-launcher. For future versions of the Burke I suggest not searching the old ones for inspirations but turn to the South Korean Sejong the Great class. This picture perfectly demonstrates the arnament and other details, I suggest using it. http://www.c7f.navy.mil/imagery/high-re ... 01-819.jpg
Last edited by Karle94 on August 15th, 2012, 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.