Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 14 of 15  [ 143 posts ]  Go to page « 111 12 13 14 15 »
Author Message
reytuerto
Post subject: Re: Treaty Cruiser Design ChallengePosted: May 3rd, 2018, 2:43 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1319
Joined: February 21st, 2015, 12:03 am
Hi, JSB:
Yes, it is feasible to put all the cruisers of the challenge in one sheet, but without the coat of arms and without the technicals specs. Cheers.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Treaty Cruiser Design ChallengePosted: May 3rd, 2018, 5:03 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 8505
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
congratulations to everybody

I had some ideas, but I never got happy with any of them and they wouldn't work


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Treaty Cruiser Design ChallengePosted: May 3rd, 2018, 5:16 pm
Offline
Posts: 5155
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact: Website
Yes, I'd like to see the comments for each compiled into a chart in the first post. A big chart of each entry would be nice too. @shigure?

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Shigure
Post subject: Re: Treaty Cruiser Design ChallengePosted: May 3rd, 2018, 5:24 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 794
Joined: May 25th, 2016, 2:05 pm
Here you go, the link the the judging sheet. It'll be in the first post too.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing

_________________
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: Treaty Cruiser Design ChallengePosted: May 3rd, 2018, 6:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2759
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
Boys, I've spotted something off. Reginald/Regia gave 42 points to Rowdy's Romana Class cruiser, but in the totals sheet there is a 25 instead. He should get a total of 197 points, not 180. :P

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
maomatic
Post subject: Re: Treaty Cruiser Design ChallengePosted: May 6th, 2018, 7:38 am
Offline
Posts: 421
Joined: February 20th, 2014, 7:46 pm
Location: Germany
Wow, with competition this strong, I wasn't sure, that I'd make it.
And looking at the scores it was indeed a very tight 'match'.

So, thank you very very much guys!

And well done to everyone who has participated. It was fun!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
pepembr_mb
Post subject: Just to show my learning curvePosted: May 27th, 2018, 10:51 am
Offline
Posts: 172
Joined: December 15th, 2016, 12:17 pm
This is my Brasil heavy cruiser redone after I read the critics:

[ img ]


This is how she looks after her 1944 refit in USA:

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Treaty Cruiser Design ChallengePosted: May 28th, 2018, 4:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1017
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
Already looking better, although the hull shading is still a bit wonky: The upper part of the above water hull shouldn't be a lighter tone unless it is completely vertical over that entire stretch.

As a further addition, might I suggest using single pixel portholes like Colo does in his new cruiser drawings? They more accurately depict the real size of portholes.

http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=7805

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
JSB
Post subject: Re: Treaty Cruiser Design ChallengePosted: May 28th, 2018, 8:01 pm
Offline
Posts: 1433
Joined: January 21st, 2014, 5:33 pm
I agree the shading is better my questions would be,

1- why so much light AA on the first one (what's the date?)
2- would a float plane not be better on the earlier one?
3- why raise up the DP guns
4- what is the director (DP?) behind the front funnel doing would its arcs not be very limited and covered by the other two directors anyway? I would remove or place to the side in diamond?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
pepembr_mb
Post subject: Re: Treaty Cruiser Design ChallengePosted: May 29th, 2018, 12:36 am
Offline
Posts: 172
Joined: December 15th, 2016, 12:17 pm
JSB wrote: *
I agree the shading is better my questions would be,

1- why so much light AA on the first one (what's the date?)

2- would a float plane not be better on the earlier one?
The date is 1935 and the ship is in a Third World country to counter the Argentinian Admiral Brown heavy cruiser. In all Argentinian Navy there was only three floatplanes able to reconaissance duties. In the Brazilian Navy there was only one one torpedo bomber squadron able to coastal duties.
JSB wrote: *
3- why raise up the DP guns
To give her a better arch of fire.
JSB wrote: *
4- what is the director (DP?) behind the front funnel doing would its arcs not be very limited and covered by the other two directors anyway? I would remove or place to the side in diamond?
They are there to supplement the 5' guns. You have four anti aircraft directors covering 360°.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 14 of 15  [ 143 posts ]  Return to “Drawing Challenges” | Go to page « 111 12 13 14 15 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]