[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 1  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
Paul Carl
Post subject: DDH 310 Improved City CLassPosted: December 31st, 2012, 5:48 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 207
Joined: February 21st, 2011, 3:15 am
Here is something I have been working on, please offer me some feed back.

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Morten812
Post subject: Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLassPosted: December 31st, 2012, 9:23 am
Offline
Posts: 254
Joined: September 16th, 2011, 7:02 am
Location: Denmark
Contact: Website
Something wrong with the image....

_________________
Morten812

Morten Jensen
Randers
Denmark

Traffic Manager


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Paul Carl
Post subject: Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLassPosted: January 5th, 2013, 10:38 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 207
Joined: February 21st, 2011, 3:15 am
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Paul Carl
Post subject: Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLassPosted: January 5th, 2013, 10:40 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 207
Joined: February 21st, 2011, 3:15 am
It is still fuzzy what am I doing wrong. I used paintshop.... uploaded to both photobucket and drop box ... please help


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLassPosted: January 5th, 2013, 10:44 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 8312
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
use drobox and save it as an PNG.

Photobucket have at the moment locked the upload size, and thus re scale everything. I suggest that someone that have time ask photobucket when they will fix this...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Paul Carl
Post subject: Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLassPosted: January 5th, 2013, 11:40 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 207
Joined: February 21st, 2011, 3:15 am
ok I will try that


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Paul Carl
Post subject: Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLassPosted: January 5th, 2013, 11:42 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 207
Joined: February 21st, 2011, 3:15 am
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ps08r4rcgewjc ... 0%20AU.png


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLassPosted: January 6th, 2013, 12:19 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3741
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
You are going to have horrendous field of view issues with your aft facing SPY-1 faces, and most stem from the funnels. Either raise the faces or spread them out, or do both. You missile directors are also of lower power than would be expected for an SPY-1 equipped ship, and are in a very unusual configuration. They also will help contribute the the limited field of view issues the ship will have.

_________________
Please don't call me Tim. If you don't want to use Timothy, use TJ.
MATHNET - To Cogitate and to Solve


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLassPosted: January 6th, 2013, 9:45 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7210
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
also, that hull design is an bad idea..... and I suppose your ship is diesel powered, as funnel and intake drawings are not large enough for gas turbines.
the STIR 180, which you have on board, is only powerful enough to direct ESSM and NSSM, for which you already have Mk 95 directors.
quite a few of your parts are outdated, which is not an crime but I would like to see the correct ones :P
why 4 phalanxes?
why that empty stern deck?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 1  [ 9 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only”

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]