Shipbucket
http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/

DDH 310 Improved City CLass
http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=3851
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Paul Carl [ December 31st, 2012, 5:48 am ]
Post subject:  DDH 310 Improved City CLass

Here is something I have been working on, please offer me some feed back.

[ img ]

Author:  Morten812 [ December 31st, 2012, 9:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLass

Something wrong with the image....

Author:  Paul Carl [ January 5th, 2013, 10:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLass

[ img ]

Author:  Paul Carl [ January 5th, 2013, 10:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLass

It is still fuzzy what am I doing wrong. I used paintshop.... uploaded to both photobucket and drop box ... please help

Author:  heuhen [ January 5th, 2013, 10:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLass

use drobox and save it as an PNG.

Photobucket have at the moment locked the upload size, and thus re scale everything. I suggest that someone that have time ask photobucket when they will fix this...

Author:  Paul Carl [ January 5th, 2013, 11:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLass

ok I will try that

Author:  Paul Carl [ January 5th, 2013, 11:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLass

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ps08r4rcgewjc ... 0%20AU.png

Author:  TimothyC [ January 6th, 2013, 12:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLass

You are going to have horrendous field of view issues with your aft facing SPY-1 faces, and most stem from the funnels. Either raise the faces or spread them out, or do both. You missile directors are also of lower power than would be expected for an SPY-1 equipped ship, and are in a very unusual configuration. They also will help contribute the the limited field of view issues the ship will have.

Author:  acelanceloet [ January 6th, 2013, 9:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: DDH 310 Improved City CLass

also, that hull design is an bad idea..... and I suppose your ship is diesel powered, as funnel and intake drawings are not large enough for gas turbines.
the STIR 180, which you have on board, is only powerful enough to direct ESSM and NSSM, for which you already have Mk 95 directors.
quite a few of your parts are outdated, which is not an crime but I would like to see the correct ones :P
why 4 phalanxes?
why that empty stern deck?

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/