Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 9 of 18  [ 174 posts ]  Go to page « 17 8 9 10 1118 »
Author Message
Cargil48
Post subject: Re: My AU German navyPosted: January 23rd, 2019, 11:58 pm
Offline
Posts: 233
Joined: April 1st, 2018, 9:07 pm
D


Last edited by Cargil48 on February 22nd, 2019, 8:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Cargil48
Post subject: Re: My AU German navyPosted: January 24th, 2019, 9:08 pm
Offline
Posts: 233
Joined: April 1st, 2018, 9:07 pm
D


Last edited by Cargil48 on February 22nd, 2019, 8:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: My AU German navyPosted: January 25th, 2019, 5:22 am
Offline
Posts: 3473
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: Website, Skype, YouTube
Very nice work!

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - present

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Kannevets
Post subject: Re: My AU German navyPosted: January 25th, 2019, 12:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 81
Joined: May 30th, 2017, 1:38 pm
Neither the Kaiserliche Marine, Reichsmarine, or Kriegsmarine used pennant numbers for their capital ships, so I'm not entirely sure where you're getting the CVE designation, as that was a primarily US practice. Additionally, only the Kaiserliche Marine used a prefix (SMS), and using "KM" as a prefix is a bit of a "History Channel" trope.

_________________
"What are they gonna do, fire me?" - Nate "Tic-Tac" McNally, 2016 (Fired 2019)


All my newer stuff is signed as czslworldtour.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Cargil48
Post subject: Re: My AU German navyPosted: January 25th, 2019, 6:30 pm
Offline
Posts: 233
Joined: April 1st, 2018, 9:07 pm
Kannevets wrote: *
Neither the Kaiserliche Marine, Reichsmarine, or Kriegsmarine used pennant numbers for their capital ships, so I'm not entirely sure where you're getting the CVE designation, as that was a primarily US practice. Additionally, only the Kaiserliche Marine used a prefix (SMS), and using "KM" as a prefix is a bit of a "History Channel" trope.
Thanks for your input. The CVE I mentioned primarily for the users here of SB, because I presume everyone knows that this stands for "CV escort". The DKM did not use the pennant numbers, correct, but in my AU certain classes will use them, if the ships in class are numerous for facilitating the distinction between ships. If the DKM had in those times a total of, say, 24 "Zerstörer" of more or less the same characteristics, I deem it useful for everybody to know which one is Z3 or Z15, for instance... Why not? As for KM I shall put in future always DKM, is that correct? Sails up!...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Cargil48
Post subject: Re: My AU German navyPosted: January 25th, 2019, 6:37 pm
Offline
Posts: 233
Joined: April 1st, 2018, 9:07 pm
D


Last edited by Cargil48 on February 22nd, 2019, 8:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Cargil48
Post subject: Re: My AU German navyPosted: January 25th, 2019, 8:37 pm
Offline
Posts: 233
Joined: April 1st, 2018, 9:07 pm
D


Last edited by Cargil48 on February 22nd, 2019, 8:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Cargil48
Post subject: Re: My AU German navyPosted: January 27th, 2019, 11:01 am
Offline
Posts: 233
Joined: April 1st, 2018, 9:07 pm
To the administrators:

I've made so far an effort in not only uploading drawings (which initially got some attention regarding imperfections or suggestions for a better plusibility with the timeline), and I've put an emphasys in underlining the technical details of some aspects regarding the evolutions made in the late 30s mainly in the radar technology but also on some other naval aspects. NO comments so far. So let me put here a question: What exactly is expected in this forum, mainly from beginners? What exactly is expected to deserve comments? Thanks. CG


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: My AU German navyPosted: January 27th, 2019, 6:15 pm
Offline
Posts: 2495
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
Reading about the early trials of German radar reminded me of a comparison that was done between Allied Radar advances and German advances. The one thing I remember is that the early British Radar was able to be easily upgraded part by part while the German radar needed to have virtually a complete new unit built for each advance. A clear advantage to the Allies.

Is that something you intend to improve for the Germans? A lot of wasted development time.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: My AU German navyPosted: January 27th, 2019, 6:39 pm
Offline
Posts: 5107
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact: Website
Cargil48 wrote: *
To the administrators:

I've made so far an effort in not only uploading drawings (which initially got some attention regarding imperfections or suggestions for a better plusibility with the timeline), and I've put an emphasys in underlining the technical details of some aspects regarding the evolutions made in the late 30s mainly in the radar technology but also on some other naval aspects. NO comments so far. So let me put here a question: What exactly is expected in this forum, mainly from beginners? What exactly is expected to deserve comments? Thanks. CG
There is no guarantee that you'll get comments when posting here -- it's all about whether or not other users are interested in what you post. ;)

If you are looking for more real-time feedback, consider joining the Discord chat server: https://discord.gg/5PHq8Dk

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 9 of 18  [ 174 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page « 17 8 9 10 1118 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]