| Shipbucket http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/ |
|
| Dutch parts sheet http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1307 |
Page 3 of 11 |
| Author: | acelanceloet [ November 3rd, 2011, 7:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dutch parts sheet |
new update. see first post, |
|
| Author: | acelanceloet [ December 10th, 2011, 3:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dutch parts sheet |
update again! see the V1.3 changelog for the differences. |
|
| Author: | Ballast Point [ December 18th, 2011, 9:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dutch parts sheet |
Have you artwork for the LW-01 radar antenna? What I really need is a flat pattern of the LW-01 antenna, to photo-etch it for a 1/700 model ship. |
|
| Author: | Andorianus [ February 12th, 2012, 10:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dutch parts sheet |
Nice Ace, nice. I have already used a few parts for the redraw of my AU Anghellis cruiser. (Which I promise won't make your eyes bleed this time  )Just asking, is it okay if I redraw the Gatekeeper? This may be sort of nitpicking on my behalf, and I don't mean to criticise your very nice work, but this one just doesn't look right. It's barely even noticable on most colour schemes, unfortunatly. (No shit since everything about it is small, but still.) |
|
| Author: | acelanceloet [ February 12th, 2012, 10:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dutch parts sheet |
well, gatekeeper is what it is, just an glassed hole in the I-mast in this case. I would love it though if you could draw this version: http://www.thalesgroup.com/gatekeeper/ the sizes and all are in the datasheet pdf 
|
|
| Author: | Andorianus [ February 12th, 2012, 10:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dutch parts sheet |
Ah yes, now I see why it looks like that. This one is the I-mast intergrated version, correct? I'll draw the standalone version, most likely it'll be done in 3 mins. 
|
|
| Author: | Andorianus [ February 12th, 2012, 11:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dutch parts sheet |
I drawed the version on Thales' website. Uh, I still think I haven't done it right but there's no other way to draw it other then to go outside of SB scale. It's the one on the far right. ![[ img ]](http://i1208.photobucket.com/albums/cc379/Andorianus/Gatekeeper.png) The other three are three different views based upon this (and other) reference image, which appearently shows an alternative lightweight gatekeeper (No IR cooling?) on a mount with two wind speed meters, three antennas, and two bow lights. My guess is that this is for patrol boats, coast guard etc. I can see that in order to maintain it one can remove the one of three entire gatekeeper assemblies, and take it to a workshop or something. ![[ img ]](http://www.mechatronicamagazine.nl/fileadmin/uploads_redactie_bc/images/2009/BC01/Thales_Van_Wensveen_Gatekeeper.jpg) Additional information on the website I found it (Dutch, but at least Ace can read it  ): http://www.mechatronicamagazine.nl/nieu ... ixels.html
|
|
| Author: | acelanceloet [ March 3rd, 2012, 5:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dutch parts sheet |
did an small update again, mostly for the new LW-08 that is correctly sized. for the other changes, look at the changelog. |
|
| Author: | MihoshiK [ March 3rd, 2012, 10:01 pm ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: Dutch parts sheet | |
did an small update again, mostly for the new LW-08 that is correctly sized. for the other changes, look at the changelog.
?In what way was the previous LW-08 too large? The Stabilisation mechanism was slightly exxagerated, but that was for detail's sake. The antenna should have been corectly sized?
|
||
| Author: | acelanceloet [ March 4th, 2012, 9:46 am ] | ||
| Post subject: | Re: Dutch parts sheet | ||
did an small update again, mostly for the new LW-08 that is correctly sized. for the other changes, look at the changelog.
?In what way was the previous LW-08 too large? The Stabilisation mechanism was slightly exxagerated, but that was for detail's sake. The antenna should have been corectly sized?it was redrawn by mitch, controlled by alvama and recommended by golly. I myself would rather keep the old one (just for the sake of parts standardisation, if nothing else) still, against all this might, I had no other choice then to swap them....... it was 4 pixels too wide, 3 pixels too wide or something like that.... |
|||
| Page 3 of 11 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|