| Shipbucket http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/ |
|
| US ARMY Organization http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=3119 |
Page 17 of 25 |
| Author: | Caddaric79 [ February 26th, 2018, 12:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: US ARMY Organization |
Thank you! As i said to Calis, if somebody Would see some Army's "newer" formations, just ask. Regards |
|
| Author: | rundrewrun99 [ February 28th, 2018, 3:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: US ARMY Organization |
I personally would love to see some of the modern formations. Especially some of the specialized units like CSAR and SAR |
|
| Author: | Caddaric79 [ February 28th, 2018, 9:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: US ARMY Organization |
Rather the Air Force then. I will search what I can find in public documents about Rescue Squadrons. For Special Operations Command, sources looks pretty scarce. |
|
| Author: | madmike [ February 28th, 2018, 11:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: US ARMY Organization |
Some mechanized infantry of WWII? |
|
| Author: | AF92 [ February 28th, 2018, 1:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: US ARMY Organization |
Well, I would love to see evolution of U.S. Armored Battalion just like you did with your Russian organizations likewise with M-41, M-46, M-47, M-48, M-60A1/A2, M-103 MBT's. M-551 etc. From 1950s to present Or evoultion of mobile artillery, self propelled guns. Kind regards, I really admire your work and attention to detail. |
|
| Author: | signal [ March 1st, 2018, 2:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: US ARMY Organization |
One thing I have noticed in your organizational chart for a U.S. tank battalion - the symbol you use for the light tank company is actually the NATO symbol/icon for armored cavalry. I think you need something else to represent the light tank (M5 Stuart) company. |
|
| Author: | reytuerto [ March 1st, 2018, 2:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: US ARMY Organization |
Excellent! Superb work, Caddaric! |
|
| Author: | rundrewrun99 [ March 1st, 2018, 5:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: US ARMY Organization |
One thing I have noticed in your organizational chart for a
Would Armored Cavalry not be the best descriptor for a light tank company?
U.S. tank battalion - the symbol you use for the light tank company is actually the NATO symbol/icon for armored cavalry. I think you need something else to represent the light tank (M5 Stuart) company. |
|
| Author: | Caddaric79 [ March 1st, 2018, 10:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: US ARMY Organization |
Thank you guys ! NATO what? Its a War Department conventional symbol from 1942... Historicaly the division symbol was re-used for Brigades, Squadrons and Companies with a unit number at the left (4 or D). In some manuals, a little abbreviation (Rcn, LT, HQ, Serv.) Actually I use this one to indicate clearly the activitiy. In this case: "reconnaissance and security missions, screen the advance of other tank units, etc." But to avoid controversy, I can go back to the good old way. |
|
| Author: | Cplnew83 [ March 1st, 2018, 3:13 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | Re: US ARMY Organization | ||
Thank you guys !
Frankly, you shouldn't care of the previous remarks (too much "à coté de le plaque"). Your drawing are just superb and there is nothing to add nor remove nor change.
NATO what? Its a War Department conventional symbol from 1942... Historicaly the division symbol was re-used for Brigades, Squadrons and Companies with a unit number at the left (4 or D). In some manuals, a little abbreviation (Rcn, LT, HQ, Serv.) Actually I use this one to indicate clearly the activitiy. In this case: "reconnaissance and security missions, screen the advance of other tank units, etc." But to avoid controversy, I can go back to the good old way. |
|||
| Page 17 of 25 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|