Shipbucket http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/ |
|
FD Aircraft 20 http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=10733 |
Page 39 of 48 |
Author: | nighthunter [ October 17th, 2023, 9:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: FD Aircraft 20 |
So, first the Boeing FB-5, which I swear I posted when it was made, but can't find evidence that I have. Oh well. Second is the Failed Northrop XFT, as it had the propensity to go into a spin and be difficult to recover. Boeing FB-5: Northrop XFT: |
Author: | Cascadia [ October 18th, 2023, 4:30 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: FD Aircraft 20 | ||
So, first the Boeing FB-5, which I swear I posted when it was made, but can't find evidence that I have.
Well, I would say you had. because I have your drawing on my drive since 2016.
|
Author: | eswube [ October 18th, 2023, 9:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: FD Aircraft 20 |
Very nice entries from everyone. |
Author: | nighthunter [ October 19th, 2023, 5:38 am ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: FD Aircraft 20 | ||
So, first the Boeing FB-5, which I swear I posted when it was made, but can't find evidence that I have.
Well, I would say you had. because I have your drawing on my drive since 2016.
Well, here's a new Boeing bird that I just completed, the Boeing F2B: |
Author: | nighthunter [ October 20th, 2023, 11:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: FD Aircraft 20 |
And yet another Boeing Navy fighter/fighter bomber, the Boeing F3B: |
Author: | Wisky [ October 22nd, 2023, 2:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: FD Aircraft 20 |
Remaking an old classic by Kilomuse; the Curtiss XP-62. Designed for the Wright R-3350-17 Cyclone, she was said to feature eight 20 millimeter cannons, as well as a pressurized canopy and a contra-rotating propeller. |
Author: | Soode [ October 24th, 2023, 1:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: FD Aircraft 20 |
Possibly my first RL drawing posted here? The IAR 823, showing a few of the most-photographed units. Despite the lack of differences in designation, there are small variations in the paneling, antennas, and exhausts, some of which may be from the original production line and some of which is certainly aftermarket. |
Author: | nighthunter [ October 24th, 2023, 11:00 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: FD Aircraft 20 | ||
United States of America, Vought V-141 unstable, prone to spins, and best of all, no customers. |
Author: | nighthunter [ October 25th, 2023, 4:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: FD Aircraft 20 |
Author: | reytuerto [ October 25th, 2023, 8:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: FD Aircraft 20 |
Good evening, gentlemen. Some interwar models: An evolution of the previous Farman F.221, Farman F222 was longer, with different wings (with more dihedral), more powerful radial engines, retractable landing gear and a refined nose. Boulton Paul P-71 was an all metal biplane, built as mail and passenger aircraft. Only two were built, and as both were destroyed in accidents within a year of its introduccion in Imperial Airways, today is largely unknown. Armstrong Whitworth AW.23 loose the competition against Bristol Bombay for a bomber-transport, but was the basis for the future Whitley RAF medium bomber. Two large biplanes of conventional steel, wood, aluminium alloy and fabric compete for a 1931 "general purpose" design (general purpose = dive bomber, torpedo carrier, observation, army cooperation, reconnaissance and casualty evacuation ): Armstrong Whitworth AW.19 and Fairey G-4-31, but with the emergence in 1935 of the Vickers Wellesley, which was so superior that the RAF, abandoned the previous general purpose requirements of the earlier specification and ordered 96 Wellesleys as medium bombers. Cheers. |
Page 39 of 48 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |