Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 1  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
Obsydian Shade
Post subject: Polaris on merchant ships?Posted: June 7th, 2016, 7:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact: Yahoo Messenger, AOL
I'm not saying this idea was great--it isn't, compared to locating them on SSBNs, but it occured to me, what if the idea of doing that with a few vessels isn't to create any viable deterrant, as to drive your enemy f-ing nuts with having to potentially track and tag every sodding merchant vessel? The actual ships don't even need to carry missiles, at least not all of them, but this seems like an excellent way to get your adversary to spend far more money trying to constantly track and locate the real vessels, than you did with the conversions, or probably fake conversions in many instances, as you play a shell game that involves constantly switching (or appearing to) the empty vessels with the loaded ones. Hell, the missiles you stick in most of them can be cardboard, and it would be enough to fool spy satellites of the time.

_________________
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Polaris on merchant ships?Posted: June 7th, 2016, 8:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9060
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
well Russian have an container based missile systems... in Normal merchant container..... ehhh


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Polaris on merchant ships?Posted: June 7th, 2016, 10:06 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
This was extensively studied in the 1950s. Googling "polaris mlf" should get you on your way.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Obsydian Shade
Post subject: Re: Polaris on merchant ships?Posted: June 8th, 2016, 12:07 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact: Yahoo Messenger, AOL
I'm aware of the real issues with MLF, but again, my desire isn't so much to create any sort of effective deterrent, as it is to make the enemy waste all sorts of resources trying to keep track of a largely bogus threat, with just enough reality behind it, that it can't really be dismissed. I'm just wondering how effective this plan might really be? The idea would be to use something like Liberty/Victory ships, or some rather common merchant vessel design to facilitate this.

_________________
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
deankal55
Post subject: Re: Polaris on merchant ships?Posted: June 8th, 2016, 12:09 am
Offline
Posts: 101
Joined: December 11th, 2011, 9:11 pm
Check out the USNS Observation Island, the Polaris missile test ship converted from a Mariner Class cargo ship.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: Polaris on merchant ships?Posted: June 8th, 2016, 5:10 pm
Offline
Posts: 10648
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
Although not with Polaris, I recall reading somewhere that North Koreans might have got that idea (or that US intelligence services were afraid that they may got that idea), only rather with some Scud derivative, that could be potentially used to attack continental USA.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Polaris on merchant ships?Posted: June 8th, 2016, 9:12 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
erik_t wrote:
This was extensively studied in the 1950s. Googling "polaris mlf" should get you on your way.
And having done so here is one image, one can find there
[ img ]

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
citizen lambda
Post subject: Re: Polaris on merchant ships?Posted: June 10th, 2016, 7:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 467
Joined: March 2nd, 2016, 8:30 pm
Re. Soviet equivalent, Alexey Sokolov mentions a so-called "Skorpion" project in the early 60s to launch D-9 SLBMs from converted arctic cargo ships from Project 505. The intention is clearly mentioned to camouflage these ships as civilian shipping or auxiliary vessels. Two designs were studies, as Projects 909 and 1111.
[ img ]
[ img ]

Naturally, none left the drawing board. After the first Polaris SSBNs entered USN service, the D-9 missiles found their way onto the Project 667B (Delta-1) conventional SSBNs and the complete Skorpioncproject would be considered redundant.
More info on the project (in Russian) here.
Also in another style, remember that the Italian Navy was well on its way to refit the pre-war cruiser Guiseppe Garibaldi with Polaris missiles, before their whole nuclear deterrence went south.

_________________
Soviet Century/Cold War 2020 Alternate Universe: Soviet and other Cold War designs 1990-2020.
My Worklist


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
odysseus1980
Post subject: Re: Polaris on merchant ships?Posted: June 10th, 2016, 10:00 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3581
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact: Website
Model of Guiseppe Garibaldi:

http://www.steelnavy.com/RM%20Garibaldi.htm


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Polaris on merchant ships?Posted: June 11th, 2016, 8:24 am
Offline
Posts: 7164
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Very interesting details for the Pr.909 and Pr.1111, I hadn't realised what their precise role was.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 1  [ 10 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic”

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]