Boys, I've spotted something off. Reginald/Regia gave 42 points to Rowdy's Romana Class cruiser, but in the totals sheet there is a 25 instead. He should get a total of 197 points, not 180.
| Shipbucket http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/ |
|
| Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=8375 |
Page 14 of 15 |
| Author: | reytuerto [ May 3rd, 2018, 2:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
Hi, JSB: Yes, it is feasible to put all the cruisers of the challenge in one sheet, but without the coat of arms and without the technicals specs. Cheers. |
|
| Author: | heuhen [ May 3rd, 2018, 5:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
congratulations to everybody I had some ideas, but I never got happy with any of them and they wouldn't work |
|
| Author: | Colosseum [ May 3rd, 2018, 5:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
Yes, I'd like to see the comments for each compiled into a chart in the first post. A big chart of each entry would be nice too. @shigure? |
|
| Author: | Shigure [ May 3rd, 2018, 5:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
Here you go, the link the the judging sheet. It'll be in the first post too. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing |
|
| Author: | BB1987 [ May 3rd, 2018, 6:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
Boys, I've spotted something off. Reginald/Regia gave 42 points to Rowdy's Romana Class cruiser, but in the totals sheet there is a 25 instead. He should get a total of 197 points, not 180.
|
|
| Author: | maomatic [ May 6th, 2018, 7:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
Wow, with competition this strong, I wasn't sure, that I'd make it. And looking at the scores it was indeed a very tight 'match'. So, thank you very very much guys! And well done to everyone who has participated. It was fun! |
|
| Author: | pepembr_mb [ May 27th, 2018, 10:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Just to show my learning curve |
This is my Brasil heavy cruiser redone after I read the critics: ![[ img ]](https://www.dropbox.com/s/w5zkvgbwat5xpum/CA_Brasil_1935_FINAL.png?raw=1) This is how she looks after her 1944 refit in USA: ![[ img ]](https://www.dropbox.com/s/i22jh758ph4ug05/CA_Brasil_1944_FINAL.png?raw=1)
|
|
| Author: | MihoshiK [ May 28th, 2018, 4:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
Already looking better, although the hull shading is still a bit wonky: The upper part of the above water hull shouldn't be a lighter tone unless it is completely vertical over that entire stretch. As a further addition, might I suggest using single pixel portholes like Colo does in his new cruiser drawings? They more accurately depict the real size of portholes. http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=7805 |
|
| Author: | JSB [ May 28th, 2018, 8:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
I agree the shading is better my questions would be, 1- why so much light AA on the first one (what's the date?) 2- would a float plane not be better on the earlier one? 3- why raise up the DP guns 4- what is the director (DP?) behind the front funnel doing would its arcs not be very limited and covered by the other two directors anyway? I would remove or place to the side in diamond? |
|
| Author: | pepembr_mb [ May 29th, 2018, 12:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
I agree the shading is better my questions would be,
The date is 1935 and the ship is in a Third World country to counter the Argentinian Admiral Brown heavy cruiser. In all Argentinian Navy there was only three floatplanes able to reconaissance duties. In the Brazilian Navy there was only one one torpedo bomber squadron able to coastal duties.1- why so much light AA on the first one (what's the date?) 2- would a float plane not be better on the earlier one? 3- why raise up the DP guns
To give her a better arch of fire.4- what is the director (DP?) behind the front funnel doing would its arcs not be very limited and covered by the other two directors anyway? I would remove or place to the side in diamond?
They are there to supplement the 5' guns. You have four anti aircraft directors covering 360°.
|
|
| Page 14 of 15 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|