Shipbucket http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/ |
|
Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=8375 |
Page 12 of 15 |
Author: | reytuerto [ April 30th, 2018, 6:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
Excellent drawings! Clever designs! And the antifouling paint of Romana is very nice! |
Author: | Shigure [ April 30th, 2018, 6:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
Alright everyone! The deadline has been reached! No more entries. The judging process will begin once I have found enough judges. It shouldn't take longer than a day or two. |
Author: | nighthunter [ April 30th, 2018, 6:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
10 days later... Still no decisions |
Author: | JSB [ April 30th, 2018, 11:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
Are you going to list the ships in the first (or last) page especially as some (pepembr_mb) have more than one version to make sure they get marked once? |
Author: | Muscatatuck [ May 1st, 2018, 6:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
The more look at it, the more I fall in love with Waritem's 1935 Class, just something about the overall layout draws me in. |
Author: | Hood [ May 1st, 2018, 8:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
I must say that this has probably been one of the most successful design challenges we've ever had. |
Author: | MihoshiK [ May 1st, 2018, 1:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
Although Charguizard's French cruisers are so... quintessentially French, I have to say that for sheer practicality, Hood's Lancaster wins out. Not the biggest, not an attempt to squeeze the last drop out of the treaty, but simply useful ships. |
Author: | Gollevainen [ May 1st, 2018, 1:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
yes I adjoin, this was very nice challenge, and it gives hope we can have equally entertaining ones in the future. Lots of great designs submitted, also nice to see the pro-section of the bucket also participating. I naturally have my own favorites, but i keep my opions to myself |
Author: | erik_t [ May 1st, 2018, 1:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
The challenge for me (full disclosure: I was asked to judge and politely declined) is that I can't wrap my mind around what the treaty-era requirements really were year by year, nation by nation, when I have the benefit of hindsight. Everything I see is through the lens of a US Navy with radar and VT fuzes in the Pacific. If it doesn't ship at least 8 5/38s, it's dead to me |
Author: | JSB [ May 1st, 2018, 1:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge |
The challenge ...... is that I can't wrap my mind around what the treaty-era requirements really were year by year, nation by nation, when I have the benefit of hindsight.....
That's the issue with judging them should we judge,1- Who will win a surface (in day/night or even AA) fight in 39-45? 2- Or start to take into account date, size and cost as well as what part of LNT (8"/6") they fit into? Should we also judge drawing and design qualities seperatly or not? |
Page 12 of 15 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |