Shipbucket http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/ |
|
Incorrectly Placed Images http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1554 |
Page 11 of 14 |
Author: | Gollevainen [ April 24th, 2015, 6:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incorrectly Placed Images |
Fixed |
Author: | Rhade [ April 28th, 2015, 7:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incorrectly Placed Images |
Sorry for use it here, but can't find a proper one and I have very limited time on the net. Defense Technology Magazine page Right lower corner boys... I don't see any credits, and I'm sure they should be one. |
Author: | Novice [ September 30th, 2015, 9:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incorrectly Placed Images |
In Real Life section of Great Britain this two, which are in fact the same. One should be removed |
Author: | orionfield [ December 24th, 2019, 9:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incorrectly Placed Images |
I found two SB scale drawings in the FD scale Never Built archive: Space Launch System family - USA http://shipbucket.com/vehicles/2713 Shuttle C - USA http://shipbucket.com/vehicles/2712 |
Author: | eswube [ December 25th, 2019, 9:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incorrectly Placed Images |
@Orionfield Already sorted. Thanks for vigilance. |
Author: | orionfield [ December 27th, 2019, 9:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incorrectly Placed Images |
No problem. |
Author: | madmike [ February 14th, 2020, 6:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incorrectly Placed Images |
In this site there is, undoubtedly, a PPA drawn by Little Bird, with credit of another guy. https://www.deviantart.com/nascimenttob ... -804655958 |
Author: | homeSniper [ May 4th, 2020, 7:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incorrectly Placed Images |
Those in Real Designs / China / Patrol Vessel: http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8387 http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8388 http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8389 http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8391 http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8393 http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8394 http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8395 http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8390 I think "Coastal Warfare >> Gun Fast Attack Craft" would be a better classification for them |
Author: | eswube [ May 4th, 2020, 6:14 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: Incorrectly Placed Images | ||
Those in Real Designs / China / Patrol Vessel:
Indeed, I considered that eventuality during upload, but in the end I don't share Your opinion. Many of them in literature are described as simply "patrol boats/craft" (of course line between PC/PB and FACG is rather blurry), and some of them are definitely not fast.
(...) I think "Coastal Warfare >> Gun Fast Attack Craft" would be a better classification for them |
Author: | homeSniper [ May 7th, 2020, 5:26 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: Incorrectly Placed Images | ||
Those in Real Designs / China / Patrol Vessel:
Indeed, I considered that eventuality during upload, but in the end I don't share Your opinion. Many of them in literature are described as simply "patrol boats/craft" (of course line between PC/PB and FACG is rather blurry), and some of them are definitely not fast.
(...) I think "Coastal Warfare >> Gun Fast Attack Craft" would be a better classification for them For Type 55A and Type 62 series, FACG is OK, they are fast. For Type 52A/53A/54A and the Japanese gunboat, indeed they're not fast enough, maybe just call them "Gunboats" would be fine http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8390 this one has wrong picture, No.808 should be a Type 53A. but the picture is No.517, a Type 52A |
Page 11 of 14 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |