Shipbucket
http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/

Incorrectly Placed Images
http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1554
Page 11 of 11

Author:  Gollevainen [ April 24th, 2015, 6:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

Fixed

Author:  Rhade [ April 28th, 2015, 7:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

Sorry for use it here, but can't find a proper one and I have very limited time on the net.

Defense Technology Magazine page

[ img ]

Right lower corner boys... I don't see any credits, and I'm sure they should be one.

Author:  Novice [ September 30th, 2015, 9:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

In Real Life section of Great Britain this two, which are in fact the same.
One should be removed

Author:  orionfield [ December 24th, 2019, 9:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

I found two SB scale drawings in the FD scale Never Built archive:

Space Launch System family - USA
http://shipbucket.com/vehicles/2713

Shuttle C - USA
http://shipbucket.com/vehicles/2712

Author:  eswube [ December 25th, 2019, 9:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

@Orionfield
Already sorted. Thanks for vigilance.

Author:  orionfield [ December 27th, 2019, 9:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

No problem.

Author:  madmike [ February 14th, 2020, 6:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

In this site there is, undoubtedly, a PPA drawn by Little Bird, with credit of another guy.

https://www.deviantart.com/nascimenttob ... -804655958

Author:  homeSniper [ May 4th, 2020, 7:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

Those in Real Designs / China / Patrol Vessel:
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8387
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8388
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8389
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8391
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8393
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8394
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8395
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8390
I think "Coastal Warfare >> Gun Fast Attack Craft" would be a better classification for them

Author:  eswube [ May 4th, 2020, 6:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

homeSniper wrote: *
Those in Real Designs / China / Patrol Vessel:
(...)
I think "Coastal Warfare >> Gun Fast Attack Craft" would be a better classification for them
Indeed, I considered that eventuality during upload, but in the end I don't share Your opinion. Many of them in literature are described as simply "patrol boats/craft" (of course line between PC/PB and FACG is rather blurry), and some of them are definitely not fast.

Author:  homeSniper [ May 7th, 2020, 5:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

eswube wrote: *
homeSniper wrote: *
Those in Real Designs / China / Patrol Vessel:
(...)
I think "Coastal Warfare >> Gun Fast Attack Craft" would be a better classification for them
Indeed, I considered that eventuality during upload, but in the end I don't share Your opinion. Many of them in literature are described as simply "patrol boats/craft" (of course line between PC/PB and FACG is rather blurry), and some of them are definitely not fast.
In China, those ships are officially called “护卫艇”, could be translated as "escort boat" or "small corvette". Due to lacking destroyers and frigates, those small ships were actually major combat resource of most Chinese costal defence fleets in about 1950-1970, not just patrol vessels. This is why I think they should be classified as "Costal Warfare". Only Type 62-1G can be an exception, as it is designed as a patrol boat.
For Type 55A and Type 62 series, FACG is OK, they are fast. For Type 52A/53A/54A and the Japanese gunboat, indeed they're not fast enough, maybe just call them "Gunboats" would be fine

http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8390 this one has wrong picture, No.808 should be a Type 53A. but the picture is No.517, a Type 52A

Page 11 of 11 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/