the general way things go, relating to the above said by Gollevainen, is that artists have no problem if their drawings get replaced by something better. if it is of the same standard (both in drawing style and in accuracy) or even inferior, there is of course no need to replace the original drawing on the main site archive.
that said, I have some comments on these drawings:
first of all, in some respects it is clearly superior to what is currently on the main site. but......
- the propeller needs some work. my advice is, look at the dutch zeven provincien FFG drawing.
- the boot topping height seems a bit excessive on the bow, are you certain this is the case?
- aster has an updated drawing, here:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/63276563/GMLS%2 ... %20VLS.png
- the gun has an updated drawing, here:
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=65
-the ECM antenna on the mast is really big enough to be outlined in black.
- take a look here:
viewtopic.php?p=138066#p138066 for our basic hull shading conventions, the hull right underneath the SAMPSON, the bow and the sonar dome seem to be off. I would shade the rudder and skeg basic red too, as they are not facing down. (I would expect it to be more like this
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/632 ... 47%202.png)
- I would outline the doors, bulwarks and gangway in black instead of light grey. right now they are barely visible, which makes the ship uninteresting and flat........ something you only want on ships where the drawing would be too busy to look at, something certainly not the case on modern stealth ships like this