[Post Reply] [*]  Page 11 of 11  [ 110 posts ]  Go to page « 17 8 9 10 11
Author Message
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: Incorrectly Placed ImagesPosted: April 24th, 2015, 6:22 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4418
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
Fixed

_________________
Coming next: L/M Moskva, some research ships, pr.26bis, Pr.1144 remakes and Project 1143 complete redux.



Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
Submit your drawings to the archive here
Far Eastern AU wiki


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Incorrectly Placed ImagesPosted: April 28th, 2015, 7:21 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2702
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
Sorry for use it here, but can't find a proper one and I have very limited time on the net.

Defense Technology Magazine page

[ img ]

Right lower corner boys... I don't see any credits, and I'm sure they should be one.

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Incorrectly Placed ImagesPosted: September 30th, 2015, 9:19 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4103
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
In Real Life section of Great Britain this two, which are in fact the same.
One should be removed

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
orionfield
Post subject: Re: Incorrectly Placed ImagesPosted: December 24th, 2019, 9:52 pm
Offline
Posts: 48
Joined: May 3rd, 2015, 6:14 pm
Location: San Jose, California
Contact: Website, Skype
I found two SB scale drawings in the FD scale Never Built archive:

Space Launch System family - USA
http://shipbucket.com/vehicles/2713

Shuttle C - USA
http://shipbucket.com/vehicles/2712


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: Incorrectly Placed ImagesPosted: December 25th, 2019, 9:48 am
Offline
Posts: 9289
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
@Orionfield
Already sorted. Thanks for vigilance.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
orionfield
Post subject: Re: Incorrectly Placed ImagesPosted: December 27th, 2019, 9:49 pm
Offline
Posts: 48
Joined: May 3rd, 2015, 6:14 pm
Location: San Jose, California
Contact: Website, Skype
No problem.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
madmike
Post subject: Re: Incorrectly Placed ImagesPosted: February 14th, 2020, 6:55 pm
Offline
Posts: 144
Joined: August 2nd, 2010, 4:02 pm
In this site there is, undoubtedly, a PPA drawn by Little Bird, with credit of another guy.

https://www.deviantart.com/nascimenttob ... -804655958


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
homeSniper
Post subject: Re: Incorrectly Placed ImagesPosted: May 4th, 2020, 7:50 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 27
Joined: November 27th, 2017, 10:15 am
Those in Real Designs / China / Patrol Vessel:
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8387
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8388
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8389
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8391
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8393
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8394
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8395
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8390
I think "Coastal Warfare >> Gun Fast Attack Craft" would be a better classification for them


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: Incorrectly Placed ImagesPosted: May 4th, 2020, 6:14 pm
Offline
Posts: 9289
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
homeSniper wrote: *
Those in Real Designs / China / Patrol Vessel:
(...)
I think "Coastal Warfare >> Gun Fast Attack Craft" would be a better classification for them
Indeed, I considered that eventuality during upload, but in the end I don't share Your opinion. Many of them in literature are described as simply "patrol boats/craft" (of course line between PC/PB and FACG is rather blurry), and some of them are definitely not fast.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
homeSniper
Post subject: Re: Incorrectly Placed ImagesPosted: May 7th, 2020, 5:26 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 27
Joined: November 27th, 2017, 10:15 am
eswube wrote: *
homeSniper wrote: *
Those in Real Designs / China / Patrol Vessel:
(...)
I think "Coastal Warfare >> Gun Fast Attack Craft" would be a better classification for them
Indeed, I considered that eventuality during upload, but in the end I don't share Your opinion. Many of them in literature are described as simply "patrol boats/craft" (of course line between PC/PB and FACG is rather blurry), and some of them are definitely not fast.
In China, those ships are officially called “护卫艇”, could be translated as "escort boat" or "small corvette". Due to lacking destroyers and frigates, those small ships were actually major combat resource of most Chinese costal defence fleets in about 1950-1970, not just patrol vessels. This is why I think they should be classified as "Costal Warfare". Only Type 62-1G can be an exception, as it is designed as a patrol boat.
For Type 55A and Type 62 series, FACG is OK, they are fast. For Type 52A/53A/54A and the Japanese gunboat, indeed they're not fast enough, maybe just call them "Gunboats" would be fine

http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8390 this one has wrong picture, No.808 should be a Type 53A. but the picture is No.517, a Type 52A


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 11 of 11  [ 110 posts ]  Return to “General Discussion” | Go to page « 17 8 9 10 11

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]