Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 2  [ 13 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
BlueEagle1
Post subject: ...sub...surface CIWS?Posted: October 7th, 2010, 10:12 pm
Offline
Posts: 34
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 5:35 am
Someone I know keeps going on and on about how subsurface CIWS could be used to defeat torpedoes. Is such a system even possible? Could something like an underwater phalanx be built?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: ...sub...surface CIWS?Posted: October 7th, 2010, 10:14 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact: Website
All I know of are Nixie torpedo decoys, but they're not an active kill mechanism but rather just a distraction for the torpedo.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: ...sub...surface CIWS?Posted: October 7th, 2010, 10:47 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
In principle, there's no reason that an active-kill antitorpedo system couldn't work (although the viscosity of water implies that any plausible system would have more in common with RAM than Phalanx). However there are a huge number of incredibly challenging engineering problems associated with such a system, and it's not obvious that that is the most worthwhile to spend research money.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TurretHead
Post subject: Re: ...sub...surface CIWS?Posted: October 8th, 2010, 3:03 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 193
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:38 am
Location: End of a bad sci fi movie.
Active torpedo defence is an area that western navies kind of go silent on. They're not secret just not talked about that much hoping everyone thinks they just have Nixie. The latest (4th) this Torbuster which adds an explosive charge to Sea Scutter/Lescut (3rd gen). Previously Scutter would steal all the torpedos energy but the latest generation of torpedos were programmed to ignore any target after an unsuccessful first pass. So the charge ensures the torpedo is taken out on the first pass. These decoys are launched from the ship's chaff launcher or in submarines from the hull.

www.rafael.co.il/marketing/SIP_STORAGE/FILES/7/997.pdf


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
iiradned
Post subject: Re: ...sub...surface CIWS?Posted: October 9th, 2010, 6:32 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 138
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 11:36 am
In May 2001 Scientific American did an article on supercavitating underwater weapons. This was in the wake of the Kursk disaster.

The likeliest culprit for the explosion aboard the Kursk, was the propellant explosion in a Shkval rocket torpedo. A likely extrapolation to a future use of supercavitating projectiles was for a below-waterline gun turret firing supercaviting cannon rounds for active-kill torpedo and mine defense.

The US Navy has even done basic research on such cannon rounds as part of the Rapid Airborne Mine Clearance System. RAMICS consists of an optronic turret with a blue-green laser to calculate the refraction of the water to provide a proper aimpoint for the side firing 30mm cannon, all mounted on a Seahawk. The ammo for the 30mm gun were required to not shatter on impact with the water and maintain its velocity while it travels to the target mine. Part of the research was conducting static firing test for the ammo from tower mounted gun to a shallow target. From the results I have seen (found through Google a few years ago) the rounds perform pretty well.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: ...sub...surface CIWS?Posted: January 3rd, 2011, 1:20 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
There's also the MU90 Hard Kill.
Unlike the other systems mentioned here, this is an honest to god torpedo built to intercept other torpedoes.
I'm not sure on the exact state of development, but supposedly its close to deployment state.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: ...sub...surface CIWS?Posted: January 3rd, 2011, 9:54 am
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
Colosseum wrote:
All I know of are Nixie torpedo decoys, but they're not an active kill mechanism but rather just a distraction for the torpedo.
Nixie has been proven to be succesfull 6/10 tests that have been done before fit on nl ships (read that in the maps with information about nixie because i had to. Its for weapon techs people)
What nixie does is creating a massive sound underwater far away from the mothership. And tries to attract the torpedoe with it.
If this doesnt work. A 2nd nixie might will. And otherwise... Meh i hope i will never know :-)
Current days a new system from thales is under tests.
Im departing this year with the amstel who has the system.
I heard its called Lectas or levitas. Whatever.
We are going to test it with torpedoes from submarines.
But this system is a passive and active listener and a 3rd distract option.
It is planned to replace the tactas.

These 2 systems are the only systems i know for anti torpedoes.
For the rest i know is when shooting underwater.
The bullets slow down. And are less effective.

You better use underwater grenades instead. More chance! Haha

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Last edited by Mitchell van Os on January 7th, 2011, 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: ...sub...surface CIWS?Posted: January 3rd, 2011, 4:25 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Yeah, MU90 and Mk48/53 have a built-in secondary anti-torpedo defense. This would be analogous to using missiles like SM-2/3 to shoot down other missiles.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: ...sub...surface CIWS?Posted: January 6th, 2011, 3:30 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
The RBU series is claimed to have a nonzero hard-kill anti-torpedo capability. How much greater than zero is not clear.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: ...sub...surface CIWS?Posted: January 9th, 2011, 10:23 am
Offline
Posts: 7165
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Yes, New Scientist carried such an article about the same time, underwater turrets for ships etc. Sounded more than a bit far-fetched at the time, still does now.

Best defence is to destroy the submarine at longer-ranges so it can't open fire with torpedoes.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 2  [ 13 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic” | Go to page 1 2 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]